2014•Journal of Dongguan University of TechnologyRequires access

The Qualification of Applicant of the Judicial Confirmation:Some Reflections on the 194th of the Civil Procedure Law(2012 Revision)

LI Xiao-qion

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The amendments to the Civil Procedure Law in 2012 bring judicial confirmation system of non-litigation mediation agreement into our civil procedure. It warranted both parties can put forward the judicial confirmation to the court within the prescribed time limit,if both of them want to make the mediation agreement enforceable. However,there are obvious drawbacks to this provision,such as it brings a logical paradox,lower efficiency and it is difficult to reflect the superiority of the judicial confirmation process. The path whereby our judicial confirmation system can operate effectively is to permit a separate party to apply for judicial confirmation of the mediation agreement procedure. Furthermore,it is of great necessity to establish the objection system,to refine the jurisdiction of the judicial confirmation system and to construct error correction mechanism of judicial confirmation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The amendments to the Civil Procedure Law in 2012 bring judicial confirmation system of non-litigation mediation agreement into our civil procedure. It warranted both parties can put forward the judicial confirmation to the court within the prescribed time limit,if both of them want to make the mediation agreement enforceable. However,there are obvious drawbacks to this provision,such as it brings a logical paradox,lower efficiency and it is difficult to reflect the superiority of the judicial confirmation process. The path whereby our judicial confirmation system can operate effectively is to permit a separate party to apply for judicial confirmation of the mediation agreement procedure. Furthermore,it is of great necessity to establish the objection system,to refine the jurisdiction of the judicial confirmation system and to construct error correction mechanism of judicial confirmation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The amendments to the Civil Procedure Law in 2012 bring judicial confirmation system of non-litigation mediation agreement into our civil procedure. It warranted both parties can put forward the judicial confirmation to the court within the prescribed time limit,if both of them want to make the mediation agreement enforceable. However,there are obvious drawbacks to this provision,such as it brings a logical paradox,lower efficiency and it is difficult to reflect the superiority of the judicial confirmation process. The path whereby our judicial confirmation system can operate effectively is to permit a separate party to apply for judicial confirmation of the mediation agreement procedure. Furthermore,it is of great necessity to establish the objection system,to refine the jurisdiction of the judicial confirmation system and to construct error correction mechanism of judicial confirmation.

Key concepts: Civil procedure, Law, Mediation, Jurisdiction, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Qualification of Applicant of the Judicial Confirmation:Some Reflections on the 194th of the Civil Procedure Law(2012 Revision) — Research Paper | ScholarLens