2014•Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and LawRequires access

Prevention and Regulation of False Judicial Confirmation

Yao Ting-tin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The judicial confirmation system develops, along with t he deepening reformation of the litigation and mediation convergence mechanism. In the background of diverse dispute resolution, it has important theoretical and practical significance. However, in China's judicial practice, the applicant has no integrity and the court confirms the cases in the form examination and other factors, which induce the deviation of the system, so appears the false judicial confirmation. First, cut with the new provisions of the Civil Procedure Law and, through the analysis of the causes of false judicial confirmation, and proposed prevention mechanism to false judicial confirmation from the applicant, the courts, social multi-dimensional, then seek the best relief programs in the association between the system, finally reexamine the judicial confirmation function, putting itself on the all-sided position.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The judicial confirmation system develops, along with t he deepening reformation of the litigation and mediation convergence mechanism. In the background of diverse dispute resolution, it has important theoretical and practical significance. However, in China's judicial practice, the applicant has no integrity and the court confirms the cases in the form examination and other factors, which induce the deviation of the system, so appears the false judicial confirmation. First, cut with the new provisions of the Civil Procedure Law and, through the analysis of the causes of false judicial confirmation, and proposed prevention mechanism to false judicial confirmation from the applicant, the courts, social multi-dimensional, then seek the best relief programs in the association between the system, finally reexamine the judicial confirmation function, putting itself on the all-sided position.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The judicial confirmation system develops, along with t he deepening reformation of the litigation and mediation convergence mechanism. In the background of diverse dispute resolution, it has important theoretical and practical significance. However, in China's judicial practice, the applicant has no integrity and the court confirms the cases in the form examination and other factors, which induce the deviation of the system, so appears the false judicial confirmation. First, cut with the new provisions of the Civil Procedure Law and, through the analysis of the causes of false judicial confirmation, and proposed prevention mechanism to false judicial confirmation from the applicant, the courts, social multi-dimensional, then seek the best relief programs in the association between the system, finally reexamine the judicial confirmation function, putting itself on the all-sided position.

Key concepts: Political science, Mediation, Law, Judicial activism, Dispute resolution, Mechanism (biology), Judicial review, Position (finance)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prevention and Regulation of False Judicial Confirmation — Research Paper | ScholarLens