2013•Geology and ExplorationRequires access

Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty for Specific Gravity Tests of Soil Samples

Daqing Chen, Naiqi Shen, Guanglu Li, Zhiguo Zhang, Chen Jian

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Measurement uncertainty for specific gravity tests of soil samples affects its reliability, and also influences the accuracy of porosity and saturation obtained by transforming specific gravity and other parameters. A pail of undisturbed silt was taken as the specimen. The specific gravity of soil samples was measured by the pycnometer based on Standard for soil test method (GB/T50123-1999). According to requirements of Uncertainty Evaluation and Denotation of the Measurement Results(JJF 1059-1999), we analyzes the factors affecting measurement accuracy, then builds a calculation model for the measurement uncertainty, and then evaluates the measurement uncertainty for specific gravity of soil Samples. The result shows that the contribution to the uncertainty of the measurement results comes mainly from weighing and inhomogeneity. The expanded uncertainty of measurement results of the specific gravity of soil samples is 0.005 under the proposed testing conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Measurement uncertainty for specific gravity tests of soil samples affects its reliability, and also influences the accuracy of porosity and saturation obtained by transforming specific gravity and other parameters. A pail of undisturbed silt was taken as the specimen. The specific gravity of soil samples was measured by the pycnometer based on Standard for soil test method (GB/T50123-1999). According to requirements of Uncertainty Evaluation and Denotation of the Measurement Results(JJF 1059-1999), we analyzes the factors affecting measurement accuracy, then builds a calculation model for the measurement uncertainty, and then evaluates the measurement uncertainty for specific gravity of soil Samples. The result shows that the contribution to the uncertainty of the measurement results comes mainly from weighing and inhomogeneity. The expanded uncertainty of measurement results of the specific gravity of soil samples is 0.005 under the proposed testing conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Measurement uncertainty for specific gravity tests of soil samples affects its reliability, and also influences the accuracy of porosity and saturation obtained by transforming specific gravity and other parameters. A pail of undisturbed silt was taken as the specimen. The specific gravity of soil samples was measured by the pycnometer based on Standard for soil test method (GB/T50123-1999). According to requirements of Uncertainty Evaluation and Denotation of the Measurement Results(JJF 1059-1999), we analyzes the factors affecting measurement accuracy, then builds a calculation model for the measurement uncertainty, and then evaluates the measurement uncertainty for specific gravity of soil Samples. The result shows that the contribution to the uncertainty of the measurement results comes mainly from weighing and inhomogeneity. The expanded uncertainty of measurement results of the specific gravity of soil samples is 0.005 under the proposed testing conditions.

Key concepts: Silt, Measurement uncertainty, Specific gravity, Soil science, Standard uncertainty, Geology, Geotechnical engineering, Soil test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty for Specific Gravity Tests of Soil Samples — Research Paper | ScholarLens