2003Zhongguo kangganran hualiao zazhiRequires access

A randomized, patient-blind, multicenter comparison of gatifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections

Fu Wang

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerability of gatifloxacin versus levofloxacin in adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections(LRTI) and urinary tract infections(UTI). Methods: In this randomized, patient blind, multicenter, comparable study 248 patients were evaluable, 125 in gatifloxacin group with 50 cases of LRTI and 75 UTI;123 in levofloxacin group with 54 cases of LRTI and 69 UTI. Dosage regimen used: gatifloxacin 400?mg once daily or levofloxacin 200?mg twice daily for 7-14 days in patients with LRTI and UTI, gatifloxacin 200?mg once daily or levofloxacin 100?mg twice daily for 5 days in patients with uncomplicated UTI. Results: Clinical cure rates and total effective rates were 68.8%(86 /125), 95.2%(119 /125) in the gatifloxacin group, and 63.4%(78 /123), 91.9%(113 /123) in the levofloxacin group; the corresponding bacterial eradication rates were 89.3%(100 /112) and 89.5%(94 /105) respectively. The clinical adverse reaction rates were 25.3%(40 /158) and 18.6%(30 /161) and abnormal laboratory tests were 14.7%(22 /150) and 15.8%(24 /152) in two groups respectively. No significant difference in the above figures between the two groups. Conclusion: Gatifloxacin is as effective and safe as levofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection and urinary tract infection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: This study compared the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerability of gatifloxacin versus levofloxacin in adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections(LRTI) and urinary tract infections(UTI). Methods: In this randomized, patient blind, multicenter, comparable study 248 patients were evaluable, 125 in gatifloxacin group with 50 cases of LRTI and 75 UTI;123 in levofloxacin group with 54 cases of LRTI and 69 UTI. Dosage regimen used: gatifloxacin 400?mg once daily or levofloxacin 200?mg twice daily for 7-14 days in patients with LRTI and UTI, gatifloxacin 200?mg once daily or levofloxacin 100?mg twice daily for 5 days in patients with uncomplicated UTI. Results: Clinical cure rates and total effective rates were 68.8%(86 /125), 95.2%(119 /125) in the gatifloxacin group, and 63.4%(78 /123), 91.9%(113 /123) in the levofloxacin group; the corresponding bacterial eradication rates were 89.3%(100 /112) and 89.5%(94 /105) respectively. The clinical adverse reaction rates were 25.3%(40 /158) and 18.6%(30 /161) and abnormal laboratory tests were 14.7%(22 /150) and 15.8%(24 /152) in two groups respectively. No significant difference in the above figures between the two groups. Conclusion: Gatifloxacin is as effective and safe as levofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection and urinary tract infection.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: This study compared the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerability of gatifloxacin versus levofloxacin in adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections(LRTI) and urinary tract infections(UTI). Methods: In this randomized, patient blind, multicenter, comparable study 248 patients were evaluable, 125 in gatifloxacin group with 50 cases of LRTI and 75 UTI;123 in levofloxacin group with 54 cases of LRTI and 69 UTI. Dosage regimen used: gatifloxacin 400?mg once daily or levofloxacin 200?mg twice daily for 7-14 days in patients with LRTI and UTI, gatifloxacin 200?mg once daily or levofloxacin 100?mg twice daily for 5 days in patients with uncomplicated UTI. Results: Clinical cure rates and total effective rates were 68.8%(86 /125), 95.2%(119 /125) in the gatifloxacin group, and 63.4%(78 /123), 91.9%(113 /123) in the levofloxacin group; the corresponding bacterial eradication rates were 89.3%(100 /112) and 89.5%(94 /105) respectively. The clinical adverse reaction rates were 25.3%(40 /158) and 18.6%(30 /161) and abnormal laboratory tests were 14.7%(22 /150) and 15.8%(24 /152) in two groups respectively. No significant difference in the above figures between the two groups. Conclusion: Gatifloxacin is as effective and safe as levofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection and urinary tract infection.

Key concepts: Gatifloxacin, Levofloxacin, Medicine, Tolerability, Respiratory tract infections, Internal medicine, Urinary system, Regimen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A randomized, patient-blind, multicenter comparison of gatifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens