2012China Medical HeraldRequires access

Comparison of effect of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section

Xiuju Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section.Methods 62 cases undergoing elective cesarean section were divided into Ropivacaine group(32 cases) and Bupivacaine group(30 cases).Ropivacaine group received 0.75% Ropivacaine 1.5 mL and Bupivacaine group received 0.75% Bupivacaine 1.5 mL.Sensory block,motor block,the degree of pain by VAS scores and muscle relaxation and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the onset time and upper level of sensory block,degree of muscle relaxation between the two groups(P 0.05).The onset time of motor block was much longer in Ropivacaine group than that in Bupivacaine group,and the duration of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in Ropivacaine group than that in Bupivacaine group(P 0.05).The adverse reaction was 13.3%,9.4% respectively in the Ropivacaine group and Bupivacaine group,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P 0.05).Conclusion Both Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine are effective and safety for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section,but Ropivacaine is beneficial to clinical recovery for its shorter duration of sensory and motor block.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the effect of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section.Methods 62 cases undergoing elective cesarean section were divided into Ropivacaine group(32 cases) and Bupivacaine group(30 cases).Ropivacaine group received 0.75% Ropivacaine 1.5 mL and Bupivacaine group received 0.75% Bupivacaine 1.5 mL.Sensory block,motor block,the degree of pain by VAS scores and muscle relaxation and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the onset time and upper level of sensory block,degree of muscle relaxation between the two groups(P 0.05).The onset time of motor block was much longer in Ropivacaine group than that in Bupivacaine group,and the duration of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in Ropivacaine group than that in Bupivacaine group(P 0.05).The adverse reaction was 13.3%,9.4% respectively in the Ropivacaine group and Bupivacaine group,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P 0.05).Conclusion Both Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine are effective and safety for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section,but Ropivacaine is beneficial to clinical recovery for its shorter duration of sensory and motor block.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the effect of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section.Methods 62 cases undergoing elective cesarean section were divided into Ropivacaine group(32 cases) and Bupivacaine group(30 cases).Ropivacaine group received 0.75% Ropivacaine 1.5 mL and Bupivacaine group received 0.75% Bupivacaine 1.5 mL.Sensory block,motor block,the degree of pain by VAS scores and muscle relaxation and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the onset time and upper level of sensory block,degree of muscle relaxation between the two groups(P 0.05).The onset time of motor block was much longer in Ropivacaine group than that in Bupivacaine group,and the duration of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in Ropivacaine group than that in Bupivacaine group(P 0.05).The adverse reaction was 13.3%,9.4% respectively in the Ropivacaine group and Bupivacaine group,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P 0.05).Conclusion Both Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine are effective and safety for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section,but Ropivacaine is beneficial to clinical recovery for its shorter duration of sensory and motor block.

Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Medicine, Bupivacaine, Anesthesia, Motor block, Elective cesarean section, Lumbar, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of effect of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in cesarean section — Research Paper | ScholarLens