2008•Journal of China Clinic Medical ImagingRequires access

Comparison of radiography,CT and MR imaging in the detection of clinical atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis

Hui Qu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare radiography,CT and MR in the detection of clinical atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis.Methods:Twenty-six cases of atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis were imaged with radiography,CT and MRI.The imaging signs were analysed and diagnosed by double blind method compared with the pathologic findings.Results:Of the 26 cases,there were 8 cases with acute osteomyelitis,12 cases with chronic osteomyelitis and 3 cases with Brodie's abscess and chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis,respectively.Radiography,CT and MR made a correct diagnosis in 20 cases,3 cases were misdiagnosed as malignant bone tumors,and other 3 cases as benign bone tumors and tumor like lesions.Conclusion:It is very helpful to diagnose and differentiate atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis by analyzing X-ray,CT and MR features,understanding pathologic features and development tendency of the lesion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare radiography,CT and MR in the detection of clinical atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis.Methods:Twenty-six cases of atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis were imaged with radiography,CT and MRI.The imaging signs were analysed and diagnosed by double blind method compared with the pathologic findings.Results:Of the 26 cases,there were 8 cases with acute osteomyelitis,12 cases with chronic osteomyelitis and 3 cases with Brodie's abscess and chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis,respectively.Radiography,CT and MR made a correct diagnosis in 20 cases,3 cases were misdiagnosed as malignant bone tumors,and other 3 cases as benign bone tumors and tumor like lesions.Conclusion:It is very helpful to diagnose and differentiate atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis by analyzing X-ray,CT and MR features,understanding pathologic features and development tendency of the lesion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare radiography,CT and MR in the detection of clinical atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis.Methods:Twenty-six cases of atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis were imaged with radiography,CT and MRI.The imaging signs were analysed and diagnosed by double blind method compared with the pathologic findings.Results:Of the 26 cases,there were 8 cases with acute osteomyelitis,12 cases with chronic osteomyelitis and 3 cases with Brodie's abscess and chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis,respectively.Radiography,CT and MR made a correct diagnosis in 20 cases,3 cases were misdiagnosed as malignant bone tumors,and other 3 cases as benign bone tumors and tumor like lesions.Conclusion:It is very helpful to diagnose and differentiate atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis by analyzing X-ray,CT and MR features,understanding pathologic features and development tendency of the lesion.

Key concepts: Medicine, Osteomyelitis, Radiography, Radiology, Lesion, Pathology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of radiography,CT and MR imaging in the detection of clinical atypical pyogenic osteomyelitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens