2005Chinese Journal of OsteoporosisRequires access

Comparison between quantitative ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in osteoporosis diagnosis

Ji Hon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the sensitivity of quantitative ultrasound(QUS) in measuring bone mass comparing with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry(DEXA).Methods bone mineral density(BMD) at lumbar spine and proximal part of the femur was measured by DEXA and stiffness(STI) at calcaneus by QUS in 3266 subjects (2055 women,1211 men) of 20~89 years old in Nanjing.Results The peak value of STI and BMD was observed in the 20~29 age group in men,while in the 30~39 age group respectively in women.Parameters were decreased sharply in females after 50 years of age and after 70 year of age in male.There was no statistically significant difference between ultrasound and DEXA in osteoporsis detection rate.The correlation coefficients between STI and BMD were 0.21~0.26.Conclusions QUS is used mainly for detemining change in bone structure and DEXA in bone mass.It is better to use these two methods together to diagnose osteoporosis and predict the risk of fracture due to osteoporosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To assess the sensitivity of quantitative ultrasound(QUS) in measuring bone mass comparing with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry(DEXA).Methods bone mineral density(BMD) at lumbar spine and proximal part of the femur was measured by DEXA and stiffness(STI) at calcaneus by QUS in 3266 subjects (2055 women,1211 men) of 20~89 years old in Nanjing.Results The peak value of STI and BMD was observed in the 20~29 age group in men,while in the 30~39 age group respectively in women.Parameters were decreased sharply in females after 50 years of age and after 70 year of age in male.There was no statistically significant difference between ultrasound and DEXA in osteoporsis detection rate.The correlation coefficients between STI and BMD were 0.21~0.26.Conclusions QUS is used mainly for detemining change in bone structure and DEXA in bone mass.It is better to use these two methods together to diagnose osteoporosis and predict the risk of fracture due to osteoporosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To assess the sensitivity of quantitative ultrasound(QUS) in measuring bone mass comparing with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry(DEXA).Methods bone mineral density(BMD) at lumbar spine and proximal part of the femur was measured by DEXA and stiffness(STI) at calcaneus by QUS in 3266 subjects (2055 women,1211 men) of 20~89 years old in Nanjing.Results The peak value of STI and BMD was observed in the 20~29 age group in men,while in the 30~39 age group respectively in women.Parameters were decreased sharply in females after 50 years of age and after 70 year of age in male.There was no statistically significant difference between ultrasound and DEXA in osteoporsis detection rate.The correlation coefficients between STI and BMD were 0.21~0.26.Conclusions QUS is used mainly for detemining change in bone structure and DEXA in bone mass.It is better to use these two methods together to diagnose osteoporosis and predict the risk of fracture due to osteoporosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Osteoporosis, Bone mineral, Calcaneus, Dual energy, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Bone mass, Ultrasound

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between quantitative ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in osteoporosis diagnosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens