2008Shiyong yixue zazhiRequires access

A meta-analysis on domestic irbesartan in the treatment of mild to moderate primary hypertension

Zeng Wen-y

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of domestic irbesartan in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. Methods The outcomes of five blind, randomized, control clinical trials were quantitatively evaluated using meta-analysis. Losartan was used as control. Results There was no significant difference in lowering blood pressure between the irbesartan group and the losartan group (P = 0.06), but irbesartan had a slightly better efficacy. HR did not differ significantly after irbesartan therapy, as compared with the baseline (P = 0.88). The weighted mean difference of losartan was 1.77, 95%CI (0.11, 3.43), suggesting that heart rate was slightly declined after treatment with losartan. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence rate of adverse events (P = 0.99). Conclusion Irbesartan is safe and effective in lowering mild to moderate primary hypertension.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of domestic irbesartan in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. Methods The outcomes of five blind, randomized, control clinical trials were quantitatively evaluated using meta-analysis. Losartan was used as control. Results There was no significant difference in lowering blood pressure between the irbesartan group and the losartan group (P = 0.06), but irbesartan had a slightly better efficacy. HR did not differ significantly after irbesartan therapy, as compared with the baseline (P = 0.88). The weighted mean difference of losartan was 1.77, 95%CI (0.11, 3.43), suggesting that heart rate was slightly declined after treatment with losartan. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence rate of adverse events (P = 0.99). Conclusion Irbesartan is safe and effective in lowering mild to moderate primary hypertension.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of domestic irbesartan in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. Methods The outcomes of five blind, randomized, control clinical trials were quantitatively evaluated using meta-analysis. Losartan was used as control. Results There was no significant difference in lowering blood pressure between the irbesartan group and the losartan group (P = 0.06), but irbesartan had a slightly better efficacy. HR did not differ significantly after irbesartan therapy, as compared with the baseline (P = 0.88). The weighted mean difference of losartan was 1.77, 95%CI (0.11, 3.43), suggesting that heart rate was slightly declined after treatment with losartan. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence rate of adverse events (P = 0.99). Conclusion Irbesartan is safe and effective in lowering mild to moderate primary hypertension.

Key concepts: Irbesartan, Losartan, Medicine, Internal medicine, Blood pressure, Significant difference, Randomized controlled trial, Angiotensin II

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A meta-analysis on domestic irbesartan in the treatment of mild to moderate primary hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens