2012Journal of University of Science and Technology BeijingRequires access

Fluidizing reduction roasting of low grade pyrolusite

Wang Ji-xue

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Contrast experiments between fluidizing reduction roasting and muffle furnace static roasting were performed with a fluidized bed and a muffle furnace.It is found that the former is obviously better in terms of roasting time and reduction efficiency.CO and N2 were used as reducing gas and fluid medium in fluidizing reduction roasting,respectively,and the effects of operation parameters such as roasting temperature,roasting time,and reducing atmosphere on the reduction efficiency were analyzed.When the roasting temperature is 800 ℃,the roasting time is 3 min,and the volume fraction of CO is 10%,a reduction efficiency of greater than 97% for MnO2 in pyrolusite can be achieved.The reduction kinetics was also investigated,and it is confirmed that the reduction process is controlled by interface chemical reaction.The apparent activation energy of the reduction is about 38.817 kJ·mol-1.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Contrast experiments between fluidizing reduction roasting and muffle furnace static roasting were performed with a fluidized bed and a muffle furnace.It is found that the former is obviously better in terms of roasting time and reduction efficiency.CO and N2 were used as reducing gas and fluid medium in fluidizing reduction roasting,respectively,and the effects of operation parameters such as roasting temperature,roasting time,and reducing atmosphere on the reduction efficiency were analyzed.When the roasting temperature is 800 ℃,the roasting time is 3 min,and the volume fraction of CO is 10%,a reduction efficiency of greater than 97% for MnO2 in pyrolusite can be achieved.The reduction kinetics was also investigated,and it is confirmed that the reduction process is controlled by interface chemical reaction.The apparent activation energy of the reduction is about 38.817 kJ·mol-1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Contrast experiments between fluidizing reduction roasting and muffle furnace static roasting were performed with a fluidized bed and a muffle furnace.It is found that the former is obviously better in terms of roasting time and reduction efficiency.CO and N2 were used as reducing gas and fluid medium in fluidizing reduction roasting,respectively,and the effects of operation parameters such as roasting temperature,roasting time,and reducing atmosphere on the reduction efficiency were analyzed.When the roasting temperature is 800 ℃,the roasting time is 3 min,and the volume fraction of CO is 10%,a reduction efficiency of greater than 97% for MnO2 in pyrolusite can be achieved.The reduction kinetics was also investigated,and it is confirmed that the reduction process is controlled by interface chemical reaction.The apparent activation energy of the reduction is about 38.817 kJ·mol-1.

Key concepts: Roasting, Pyrolusite, Muffle furnace, Chemistry, Metallurgy, Reducing atmosphere, Fluidized bed, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fluidizing reduction roasting of low grade pyrolusite — Research Paper | ScholarLens