2011Journal of Southwest China Normal UniversityRequires access

The Comparation of the Extraction Methods for Total Flavonoids of the Chrysanthemum

Mei Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To optimize the Ultrasonic Extraction and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction,and to compare these two methods.Methods With the Rutin as the reference substance and ultraviolet spectrophotometer for analyzing the extraction rate,the extraction process is optimized after the level of factor is chosen and an orthogonal designing method L9(34) is adopted.Results The superior process conditions for the Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction are: 25 Ethanol solution(70%),with cellulose(0.5%),constant temperature(45 ℃),water bath for 150 minutes.Extraction rate is 5.60%.The superior process conditions for the Ultrasonic Extraction are: 10 Ethanol solutions(70%),ultrasound for 40 minutes,extract for 3 times.Extraction rate is 4.61%.Conclusion The extraction rate by the Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction is 21.5% higher than the rate by the Ultrasonic Extraction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To optimize the Ultrasonic Extraction and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction,and to compare these two methods.Methods With the Rutin as the reference substance and ultraviolet spectrophotometer for analyzing the extraction rate,the extraction process is optimized after the level of factor is chosen and an orthogonal designing method L9(34) is adopted.Results The superior process conditions for the Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction are: 25 Ethanol solution(70%),with cellulose(0.5%),constant temperature(45 ℃),water bath for 150 minutes.Extraction rate is 5.60%.The superior process conditions for the Ultrasonic Extraction are: 10 Ethanol solutions(70%),ultrasound for 40 minutes,extract for 3 times.Extraction rate is 4.61%.Conclusion The extraction rate by the Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction is 21.5% higher than the rate by the Ultrasonic Extraction.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To optimize the Ultrasonic Extraction and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction,and to compare these two methods.Methods With the Rutin as the reference substance and ultraviolet spectrophotometer for analyzing the extraction rate,the extraction process is optimized after the level of factor is chosen and an orthogonal designing method L9(34) is adopted.Results The superior process conditions for the Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction are: 25 Ethanol solution(70%),with cellulose(0.5%),constant temperature(45 ℃),water bath for 150 minutes.Extraction rate is 5.60%.The superior process conditions for the Ultrasonic Extraction are: 10 Ethanol solutions(70%),ultrasound for 40 minutes,extract for 3 times.Extraction rate is 4.61%.Conclusion The extraction rate by the Enzymatic Hydrolysis Extraction is 21.5% higher than the rate by the Ultrasonic Extraction.

Key concepts: Extraction (chemistry), Chromatography, Chemistry, Enzymatic hydrolysis, Rutin, Ultrasonic sensor, Hydrolysis, Cellulose

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Comparation of the Extraction Methods for Total Flavonoids of the Chrysanthemum — Research Paper | ScholarLens