2006Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary DiseasesRequires access

Effect of valsartant on ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Ri Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To observe impact of valsartant on ventricular remodeling for MI patients after PCI.Method:Chose 58 patients with myocardial infarction and treated with PCI therapy. 28 patients took valsartant (80 mg/d) after the operations, and the others not. Both groups took 99 TCmMIBI myocardial perfusion imaging test assessing left ventricular size and function at 3 days before 3 months and 6 months after the operations regarding left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), etc, Clinical follow-up was obtained.Result:Before PCI therapy and during 3 months of follow-up after the therapy, there were not significant difference between the two groups in LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF. However, significant changes in LVEDV[(102.6±25.6)mL vs (117.2±28.5)mL P=0.045]and LVESV [(53.1±20.6)mL vs (66.4±28.7)mL P=0.049] were observed within the two groups at 6 months of the follow-up,and the LVEF of valsartant group increased dramatically than the normally treated group [(56.1±9.6)% vs (47.4±13.2)% P=0.006]. During a follow-up duration of 13 months, combined clinical events rate (myocardial infarction again, heart failure, angina pectoris, stroke, death, revascularization and so on), favors a policy of valsartant group(24.0% vs 46.7% P=0.04).Conclusion:Patients with myocardial infaction should take the specific antagonist of AT1 receptor valsartant on time just after percutaneous coronary intervention therapy. It can keep away from ventricular remodeling more efficiently and protect left ventricular function. Furthermore, it can promate patients' recovery and improve living rate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To observe impact of valsartant on ventricular remodeling for MI patients after PCI.Method:Chose 58 patients with myocardial infarction and treated with PCI therapy. 28 patients took valsartant (80 mg/d) after the operations, and the others not. Both groups took 99 TCmMIBI myocardial perfusion imaging test assessing left ventricular size and function at 3 days before 3 months and 6 months after the operations regarding left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), etc, Clinical follow-up was obtained.Result:Before PCI therapy and during 3 months of follow-up after the therapy, there were not significant difference between the two groups in LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF. However, significant changes in LVEDV[(102.6±25.6)mL vs (117.2±28.5)mL P=0.045]and LVESV [(53.1±20.6)mL vs (66.4±28.7)mL P=0.049] were observed within the two groups at 6 months of the follow-up,and the LVEF of valsartant group increased dramatically than the normally treated group [(56.1±9.6)% vs (47.4±13.2)% P=0.006]. During a follow-up duration of 13 months, combined clinical events rate (myocardial infarction again, heart failure, angina pectoris, stroke, death, revascularization and so on), favors a policy of valsartant group(24.0% vs 46.7% P=0.04).Conclusion:Patients with myocardial infaction should take the specific antagonist of AT1 receptor valsartant on time just after percutaneous coronary intervention therapy. It can keep away from ventricular remodeling more efficiently and protect left ventricular function. Furthermore, it can promate patients' recovery and improve living rate.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To observe impact of valsartant on ventricular remodeling for MI patients after PCI.Method:Chose 58 patients with myocardial infarction and treated with PCI therapy. 28 patients took valsartant (80 mg/d) after the operations, and the others not. Both groups took 99 TCmMIBI myocardial perfusion imaging test assessing left ventricular size and function at 3 days before 3 months and 6 months after the operations regarding left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), etc, Clinical follow-up was obtained.Result:Before PCI therapy and during 3 months of follow-up after the therapy, there were not significant difference between the two groups in LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF. However, significant changes in LVEDV[(102.6±25.6)mL vs (117.2±28.5)mL P=0.045]and LVESV [(53.1±20.6)mL vs (66.4±28.7)mL P=0.049] were observed within the two groups at 6 months of the follow-up,and the LVEF of valsartant group increased dramatically than the normally treated group [(56.1±9.6)% vs (47.4±13.2)% P=0.006]. During a follow-up duration of 13 months, combined clinical events rate (myocardial infarction again, heart failure, angina pectoris, stroke, death, revascularization and so on), favors a policy of valsartant group(24.0% vs 46.7% P=0.04).Conclusion:Patients with myocardial infaction should take the specific antagonist of AT1 receptor valsartant on time just after percutaneous coronary intervention therapy. It can keep away from ventricular remodeling more efficiently and protect left ventricular function. Furthermore, it can promate patients' recovery and improve living rate.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cardiology, Ejection fraction, Internal medicine, Myocardial infarction, Conventional PCI, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Ventricular remodeling

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of valsartant on ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention — Research Paper | ScholarLens