2005Zhonghua mazuixue zazhiRequires access

Protective effect of propofol combined with Ugustrazin on liver against ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats

Yuanhai Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the protective effect of propofol (Pro) in combination with ligustrazin (Lig) on the liver against ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and the mechanisms involved.Methods Fifty male SD rats weighing 240-280 g were randomly divided into 5 groups of 10 animals each: group Ⅰ received sham operation (sham); group Ⅱ I/R; group Ⅲ Pro + I/R; group Ⅳ Lig + I/R and group Ⅴ Pro + Lag + I/R. The animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal pentobarbital 20 mg·kg-1 . Liver ischemia was produced by clamping the hepatic hilum for 30 min, then the clamp was removed for 60 min reperfusion. In group Ⅲ propofol was infused at 20 mg·kg-1 ?h-1 starting from 20 min before ischemia until hepatic hilum was clamped. In group Ⅳ a bolus of ligustrazin 60 mg·kg-1 was given i.v. 20 min before ischemia. In group Ⅴ propofol was infused and a bolus of ligustrazin was given i.v. as in group Ⅲ and Ⅳ 20 min before hepatic ischemia. Blood samples were taken at the end of 60 min reperfusion for determination of serum activities of ALT, AST and LDH and meanwhile a liver specimen was obtained for determination of MDA content, SOD and XOD activities and for electron microscopic examination. Results Serum ALT and AST activities were significantly higher in group Ⅱ , Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅰ (sham) (P0.01), but were significantly lower in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ (I/R) (P 0.05 or 0.01). Serum ALT activity was significantly lower in group Ⅴ than in group Ⅲ and Ⅳ ( P 0.05) . There was no significant difference in plasma LDH activity among the 5 groups. The MDA content of liver was significantly higher in group Ⅱ , Ⅲ and Ⅳ than in group Ⅰ (sham) , but was significantly lower in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and V than in group Ⅱ (I/R) (P 0.05 or 0.01). The SOD activity of liver was significantly higher in group Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ(P0.05或0.01), whereas the XOD activity was significantly lower in group Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ . Electron microscopic examination showed that the pathologic changes induced by I/R was slight in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ as compared with group Ⅱ ( P 0.05) . Conclusion Both propofol and ligustrazin can protect liver against I/R injury by their anti-oxidant activities and the protective effect was potentiated when they are used in combination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the protective effect of propofol (Pro) in combination with ligustrazin (Lig) on the liver against ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and the mechanisms involved.Methods Fifty male SD rats weighing 240-280 g were randomly divided into 5 groups of 10 animals each: group Ⅰ received sham operation (sham); group Ⅱ I/R; group Ⅲ Pro + I/R; group Ⅳ Lig + I/R and group Ⅴ Pro + Lag + I/R. The animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal pentobarbital 20 mg·kg-1 . Liver ischemia was produced by clamping the hepatic hilum for 30 min, then the clamp was removed for 60 min reperfusion. In group Ⅲ propofol was infused at 20 mg·kg-1 ?h-1 starting from 20 min before ischemia until hepatic hilum was clamped. In group Ⅳ a bolus of ligustrazin 60 mg·kg-1 was given i.v. 20 min before ischemia. In group Ⅴ propofol was infused and a bolus of ligustrazin was given i.v. as in group Ⅲ and Ⅳ 20 min before hepatic ischemia. Blood samples were taken at the end of 60 min reperfusion for determination of serum activities of ALT, AST and LDH and meanwhile a liver specimen was obtained for determination of MDA content, SOD and XOD activities and for electron microscopic examination. Results Serum ALT and AST activities were significantly higher in group Ⅱ , Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅰ (sham) (P0.01), but were significantly lower in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ (I/R) (P 0.05 or 0.01). Serum ALT activity was significantly lower in group Ⅴ than in group Ⅲ and Ⅳ ( P 0.05) . There was no significant difference in plasma LDH activity among the 5 groups. The MDA content of liver was significantly higher in group Ⅱ , Ⅲ and Ⅳ than in group Ⅰ (sham) , but was significantly lower in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and V than in group Ⅱ (I/R) (P 0.05 or 0.01). The SOD activity of liver was significantly higher in group Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ(P0.05或0.01), whereas the XOD activity was significantly lower in group Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ . Electron microscopic examination showed that the pathologic changes induced by I/R was slight in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ as compared with group Ⅱ ( P 0.05) . Conclusion Both propofol and ligustrazin can protect liver against I/R injury by their anti-oxidant activities and the protective effect was potentiated when they are used in combination.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the protective effect of propofol (Pro) in combination with ligustrazin (Lig) on the liver against ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and the mechanisms involved.Methods Fifty male SD rats weighing 240-280 g were randomly divided into 5 groups of 10 animals each: group Ⅰ received sham operation (sham); group Ⅱ I/R; group Ⅲ Pro + I/R; group Ⅳ Lig + I/R and group Ⅴ Pro + Lag + I/R. The animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal pentobarbital 20 mg·kg-1 . Liver ischemia was produced by clamping the hepatic hilum for 30 min, then the clamp was removed for 60 min reperfusion. In group Ⅲ propofol was infused at 20 mg·kg-1 ?h-1 starting from 20 min before ischemia until hepatic hilum was clamped. In group Ⅳ a bolus of ligustrazin 60 mg·kg-1 was given i.v. 20 min before ischemia. In group Ⅴ propofol was infused and a bolus of ligustrazin was given i.v. as in group Ⅲ and Ⅳ 20 min before hepatic ischemia. Blood samples were taken at the end of 60 min reperfusion for determination of serum activities of ALT, AST and LDH and meanwhile a liver specimen was obtained for determination of MDA content, SOD and XOD activities and for electron microscopic examination. Results Serum ALT and AST activities were significantly higher in group Ⅱ , Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅰ (sham) (P0.01), but were significantly lower in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ (I/R) (P 0.05 or 0.01). Serum ALT activity was significantly lower in group Ⅴ than in group Ⅲ and Ⅳ ( P 0.05) . There was no significant difference in plasma LDH activity among the 5 groups. The MDA content of liver was significantly higher in group Ⅱ , Ⅲ and Ⅳ than in group Ⅰ (sham) , but was significantly lower in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and V than in group Ⅱ (I/R) (P 0.05 or 0.01). The SOD activity of liver was significantly higher in group Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ(P0.05或0.01), whereas the XOD activity was significantly lower in group Ⅴ than in group Ⅱ . Electron microscopic examination showed that the pathologic changes induced by I/R was slight in group Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ as compared with group Ⅱ ( P 0.05) . Conclusion Both propofol and ligustrazin can protect liver against I/R injury by their anti-oxidant activities and the protective effect was potentiated when they are used in combination.

Key concepts: Propofol, Ischemia, Pentobarbital, Medicine, Bolus (digestion), Anesthesia, Reperfusion injury, Ketamine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Protective effect of propofol combined with Ugustrazin on liver against ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats — Research Paper | ScholarLens