2011Zhongnan Linye Keji Daxue xuebaoRequires access

On the Function and Regulation of Judicial Activism

Huang Juan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Judicial activism in China has been a hotspot discussed by theorists and judicial practitioners.It originated in America,relating to the practice of the Supreme Court.In China,in order to cope with social needs,judicial activism is put forward by the decision maker from top to bottom,and is carried out in the practice of courts at all levels.Judging from existing results,generalizations and explains about judicial activism are multiple.On the background of judicial reforms,the exertion of judicial activism will be beneficial to fill up legal flaw,improve judicial efficiency and realize judicial equity.It will also be beneficial to build up the philosophy about initiating action and judicature for the people.At the same time,we should acknowledge the two-sidedness of judicial activism.It can be regulated through legislative improvement,construction about system of judicial activism and promotion to judicial professionalism,which would ensure the reality of judicial equity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Judicial activism in China has been a hotspot discussed by theorists and judicial practitioners.It originated in America,relating to the practice of the Supreme Court.In China,in order to cope with social needs,judicial activism is put forward by the decision maker from top to bottom,and is carried out in the practice of courts at all levels.Judging from existing results,generalizations and explains about judicial activism are multiple.On the background of judicial reforms,the exertion of judicial activism will be beneficial to fill up legal flaw,improve judicial efficiency and realize judicial equity.It will also be beneficial to build up the philosophy about initiating action and judicature for the people.At the same time,we should acknowledge the two-sidedness of judicial activism.It can be regulated through legislative improvement,construction about system of judicial activism and promotion to judicial professionalism,which would ensure the reality of judicial equity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Judicial activism in China has been a hotspot discussed by theorists and judicial practitioners.It originated in America,relating to the practice of the Supreme Court.In China,in order to cope with social needs,judicial activism is put forward by the decision maker from top to bottom,and is carried out in the practice of courts at all levels.Judging from existing results,generalizations and explains about judicial activism are multiple.On the background of judicial reforms,the exertion of judicial activism will be beneficial to fill up legal flaw,improve judicial efficiency and realize judicial equity.It will also be beneficial to build up the philosophy about initiating action and judicature for the people.At the same time,we should acknowledge the two-sidedness of judicial activism.It can be regulated through legislative improvement,construction about system of judicial activism and promotion to judicial professionalism,which would ensure the reality of judicial equity.

Key concepts: Judicial activism, Legislature, Political science, Law, Equity (law), Judicial review, Judicial opinion, Judicial discretion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Function and Regulation of Judicial Activism — Research Paper | ScholarLens