2008Radiologic PracticeRequires access

Imaging Diagnosis of Carotid Body Tumor

Chen Dai-wen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the imaging manifestations of ultrasonography,CT,MRI and DSA for improving preoperative diagnosis of carotid body tumors(CBT).Methods:Fourteen cases of CBT were confirmed by pathology,including 10 cases of unilateral ones and 4 cases of bilateral ones.The imaging manifestations of CBT were analyzed retrospectively.Results:Each imaging examination could display well the location,size and form of the tumor.The specific sonogram of CBT was isoechoic or hypoechoic solid lesion and small tubular areas could be seen in masses measured over 3cm in diameter,but the upper borderline of the tumor appeared indistinctive.Colour Doppler ultrasound showed web-like vessels inside the tumor in 9 cases,and 1 case was misdiagnosed as schwannoma.The rate of correct diagnosis was 93%(14/15).Fourteen cases were examined by helical CT enhancement,which reflected the hypervascular nature of CBT.In 12 cases the tumor could not be distinguished from the internal and the external carotid arteries because they were evenly enhanced and 2 cases were unevenly enhanced.The CT values were 150~180HU.The preoperatiove correct diagnosis rate was 100%(14/14).Eleven cases were examined with MRI and MRA.MRI imaging of CBT featured flow-void tumor vessels,and internal and external carotid arteries attached to or embedded respectively in the rear and the front of the external side of masses,distinctively seperated.MRA showed clearly the distinction between CBT and common carotid arteries and their branches.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(11/11).Eleven cases were examined with DSA.Angiography could confirm diagnosis and showed feeding vessels.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(8/8).Conclusion:Ultrasound,CT and MRI are valuable and specific in diagnosis of CBT.There is no statistically significant difference in 4 kinds of imaging diagnostic methoes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the imaging manifestations of ultrasonography,CT,MRI and DSA for improving preoperative diagnosis of carotid body tumors(CBT).Methods:Fourteen cases of CBT were confirmed by pathology,including 10 cases of unilateral ones and 4 cases of bilateral ones.The imaging manifestations of CBT were analyzed retrospectively.Results:Each imaging examination could display well the location,size and form of the tumor.The specific sonogram of CBT was isoechoic or hypoechoic solid lesion and small tubular areas could be seen in masses measured over 3cm in diameter,but the upper borderline of the tumor appeared indistinctive.Colour Doppler ultrasound showed web-like vessels inside the tumor in 9 cases,and 1 case was misdiagnosed as schwannoma.The rate of correct diagnosis was 93%(14/15).Fourteen cases were examined by helical CT enhancement,which reflected the hypervascular nature of CBT.In 12 cases the tumor could not be distinguished from the internal and the external carotid arteries because they were evenly enhanced and 2 cases were unevenly enhanced.The CT values were 150~180HU.The preoperatiove correct diagnosis rate was 100%(14/14).Eleven cases were examined with MRI and MRA.MRI imaging of CBT featured flow-void tumor vessels,and internal and external carotid arteries attached to or embedded respectively in the rear and the front of the external side of masses,distinctively seperated.MRA showed clearly the distinction between CBT and common carotid arteries and their branches.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(11/11).Eleven cases were examined with DSA.Angiography could confirm diagnosis and showed feeding vessels.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(8/8).Conclusion:Ultrasound,CT and MRI are valuable and specific in diagnosis of CBT.There is no statistically significant difference in 4 kinds of imaging diagnostic methoes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the imaging manifestations of ultrasonography,CT,MRI and DSA for improving preoperative diagnosis of carotid body tumors(CBT).Methods:Fourteen cases of CBT were confirmed by pathology,including 10 cases of unilateral ones and 4 cases of bilateral ones.The imaging manifestations of CBT were analyzed retrospectively.Results:Each imaging examination could display well the location,size and form of the tumor.The specific sonogram of CBT was isoechoic or hypoechoic solid lesion and small tubular areas could be seen in masses measured over 3cm in diameter,but the upper borderline of the tumor appeared indistinctive.Colour Doppler ultrasound showed web-like vessels inside the tumor in 9 cases,and 1 case was misdiagnosed as schwannoma.The rate of correct diagnosis was 93%(14/15).Fourteen cases were examined by helical CT enhancement,which reflected the hypervascular nature of CBT.In 12 cases the tumor could not be distinguished from the internal and the external carotid arteries because they were evenly enhanced and 2 cases were unevenly enhanced.The CT values were 150~180HU.The preoperatiove correct diagnosis rate was 100%(14/14).Eleven cases were examined with MRI and MRA.MRI imaging of CBT featured flow-void tumor vessels,and internal and external carotid arteries attached to or embedded respectively in the rear and the front of the external side of masses,distinctively seperated.MRA showed clearly the distinction between CBT and common carotid arteries and their branches.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(11/11).Eleven cases were examined with DSA.Angiography could confirm diagnosis and showed feeding vessels.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(8/8).Conclusion:Ultrasound,CT and MRI are valuable and specific in diagnosis of CBT.There is no statistically significant difference in 4 kinds of imaging diagnostic methoes.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiology, Lesion, Ultrasound, Carotid body, Carotid arteries, Chemodectoma, Internal carotid artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Imaging Diagnosis of Carotid Body Tumor — Research Paper | ScholarLens