2009Journal of medical imagingRequires access

The value of CTA and MRA in the diagnosis of carotid body tumors

Ziqian Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To study the value of CTA and MRA in the diagnosis of carotid body tumors.Methods:14 cases of CBT were verified by pathology,10 unilateral cases and 4 bilateral cases.The radiological image manifestations of CBT were analyzed retrospectively.Results:Each imaging examination was able to locate and highlight the physical shape of CBT.The specific sonogram of CBT was isoechoic or hypoechoic solid lesion,small tubular areas could be seen in masses measured over 3 cm in diameter,but the upper borderline of the tumor appeared indistinctive.14 cases were examined by helical CT enhancement,which reflected the vascular nature of CBT,in 12 cases the tumor could not be distinguished from the internal and the external carotid arteries because they were evenly enhanced and 2 cases were unevenly enhanced.The values of CT was 150~180 HU.The correct rate for preoperatiove diagnosis was 100%(14/14).11 cases were examined with MRI and MRA.MRI imaging of CBT featured flow-void tumor vessels,and internal and external carotid arteries attached to or embedded respectively in the rear and the front of the external side of masses.MRA showed clearly the distinction between CBT and common carotid arteries and their branches.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(11/11).Conclusion:CTA and MRA are valuable and specific in diagnosis of CBT.There are no significant statistics difference in 2 kinds of imaging diagnostic methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To study the value of CTA and MRA in the diagnosis of carotid body tumors.Methods:14 cases of CBT were verified by pathology,10 unilateral cases and 4 bilateral cases.The radiological image manifestations of CBT were analyzed retrospectively.Results:Each imaging examination was able to locate and highlight the physical shape of CBT.The specific sonogram of CBT was isoechoic or hypoechoic solid lesion,small tubular areas could be seen in masses measured over 3 cm in diameter,but the upper borderline of the tumor appeared indistinctive.14 cases were examined by helical CT enhancement,which reflected the vascular nature of CBT,in 12 cases the tumor could not be distinguished from the internal and the external carotid arteries because they were evenly enhanced and 2 cases were unevenly enhanced.The values of CT was 150~180 HU.The correct rate for preoperatiove diagnosis was 100%(14/14).11 cases were examined with MRI and MRA.MRI imaging of CBT featured flow-void tumor vessels,and internal and external carotid arteries attached to or embedded respectively in the rear and the front of the external side of masses.MRA showed clearly the distinction between CBT and common carotid arteries and their branches.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(11/11).Conclusion:CTA and MRA are valuable and specific in diagnosis of CBT.There are no significant statistics difference in 2 kinds of imaging diagnostic methods.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To study the value of CTA and MRA in the diagnosis of carotid body tumors.Methods:14 cases of CBT were verified by pathology,10 unilateral cases and 4 bilateral cases.The radiological image manifestations of CBT were analyzed retrospectively.Results:Each imaging examination was able to locate and highlight the physical shape of CBT.The specific sonogram of CBT was isoechoic or hypoechoic solid lesion,small tubular areas could be seen in masses measured over 3 cm in diameter,but the upper borderline of the tumor appeared indistinctive.14 cases were examined by helical CT enhancement,which reflected the vascular nature of CBT,in 12 cases the tumor could not be distinguished from the internal and the external carotid arteries because they were evenly enhanced and 2 cases were unevenly enhanced.The values of CT was 150~180 HU.The correct rate for preoperatiove diagnosis was 100%(14/14).11 cases were examined with MRI and MRA.MRI imaging of CBT featured flow-void tumor vessels,and internal and external carotid arteries attached to or embedded respectively in the rear and the front of the external side of masses.MRA showed clearly the distinction between CBT and common carotid arteries and their branches.The rate of correct diagnosis was 100%(11/11).Conclusion:CTA and MRA are valuable and specific in diagnosis of CBT.There are no significant statistics difference in 2 kinds of imaging diagnostic methods.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiology, Lesion, Carotid arteries, Nuclear medicine, Pathology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The value of CTA and MRA in the diagnosis of carotid body tumors — Research Paper | ScholarLens