2004Zhongguo redai yixueRequires access

Analysis of the distribution and drug susceptibility of 371 fungi strains resulting in deep infections.

Chen Dong-mei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the distribution and drug resistance situation of the fungi which caused deep part infection. Methods The isolated fungi were indentified with API 20C AUX and drug susceptibility tests was conducted by using ATB FUNGUS. Results 228 strains of Candida albicans, 73 strains of Candida tropicalis, 38 strains of Candida glabrata, 12 strains of Candida papasilosis, 6 strains of Candida famata, 3 strains of Cryptococcus neofermans, 3 strains of Candida inconspicua, 2 strains of Candida guilliermondii were isolated. The total sensitivity of 371 strains of fungi to 5-fluorocytosine, amphotericin B, mycomycin, miconazole, econazole, ketoconazole were 92%,97%,96%,57%,63%,69%,respectively. Conclusion The dominant pathogenic fungi which caused deep part infection were Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata. Amphotericin B, mycomycin and 5-fluorocytosine were most sensitive to the pathogenic fungi and remain to be the most effective drug to cure deep part infection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the distribution and drug resistance situation of the fungi which caused deep part infection. Methods The isolated fungi were indentified with API 20C AUX and drug susceptibility tests was conducted by using ATB FUNGUS. Results 228 strains of Candida albicans, 73 strains of Candida tropicalis, 38 strains of Candida glabrata, 12 strains of Candida papasilosis, 6 strains of Candida famata, 3 strains of Cryptococcus neofermans, 3 strains of Candida inconspicua, 2 strains of Candida guilliermondii were isolated. The total sensitivity of 371 strains of fungi to 5-fluorocytosine, amphotericin B, mycomycin, miconazole, econazole, ketoconazole were 92%,97%,96%,57%,63%,69%,respectively. Conclusion The dominant pathogenic fungi which caused deep part infection were Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata. Amphotericin B, mycomycin and 5-fluorocytosine were most sensitive to the pathogenic fungi and remain to be the most effective drug to cure deep part infection.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the distribution and drug resistance situation of the fungi which caused deep part infection. Methods The isolated fungi were indentified with API 20C AUX and drug susceptibility tests was conducted by using ATB FUNGUS. Results 228 strains of Candida albicans, 73 strains of Candida tropicalis, 38 strains of Candida glabrata, 12 strains of Candida papasilosis, 6 strains of Candida famata, 3 strains of Cryptococcus neofermans, 3 strains of Candida inconspicua, 2 strains of Candida guilliermondii were isolated. The total sensitivity of 371 strains of fungi to 5-fluorocytosine, amphotericin B, mycomycin, miconazole, econazole, ketoconazole were 92%,97%,96%,57%,63%,69%,respectively. Conclusion The dominant pathogenic fungi which caused deep part infection were Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata. Amphotericin B, mycomycin and 5-fluorocytosine were most sensitive to the pathogenic fungi and remain to be the most effective drug to cure deep part infection.

Key concepts: Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Microbiology, Miconazole, Candida albicans, Ketoconazole, Amphotericin B, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of the distribution and drug susceptibility of 371 fungi strains resulting in deep infections. — Research Paper | ScholarLens