2007•Zhonghua jizhen yixue zazhiRequires access

Effects of fluid resuscitation on thoracoabdominal injury combined with hemorrhagic traumatic shock

Pang Hong-gan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study effects of fluid resuscitation on thoracoabdominal injury combined with hemorrhagic traumatic shock.Method A total of 98 patients,who were treated in Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from November 2004 to December 2006,were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were diagnozed according to Surgery(fifth edition).Patients were divided into delayed fluid resuscitation group(n= 51)and immediate fluid resuscitation group(n=47).Patients in delayed fluid resuscitation group were given with balanced salt solution for the body to maintain basic requirements.Patients in immediate fluid resuscitation group were rapidly administered with a lot of isotonic crystaUoid and(or)colloid solution after admission. Hemoglobin,platelet count,hematocrit,blood lactic acid,basedeficit,preoperative resuscitation time and mortality were compared between the two groups.Paired t test and variance analysis or x~2 test were used.Results The transfusion fluid volume of delayed group and immediate group was(1586±346)ml,(3520±575)ml, respectively,with P value0.01.There was no difference on systolic blood pressure between delayed group(78±29)mmHg and immediate group(81±24)mmHg.There existed differences before operation on hemoglobin (106.21±20.91 vs 89.10±32.42 g/L),prothrombin time(11.19±2.03 vs 17.37±2.50 s),platelet count (179.44±52.19)×10~9/L vs(105.55±50.67)×10~9/L,hematocrit(28.40±2.31)% vs(20.84±2.58)%,blood lactic acid(at 30 minutes after resuscitation:1.70±0.37 vs 2.44±0.41 mmoL/L;at 60 minutes after resuscitation:3.16±0.42 us 5.73±0.68 mmol/L),basedeficit(at 30 minutes after resuscitation: -4.46±1.15vs-5.78±1.15 mmoL/L;at 60 minutes after resuscitation:-5.46±1.29 vs -9.60±2.71 mmol/L),the resuscitation time(58±26 vs 73±29)minutes,mortality was(11.3 vs 18.9)%. Delayed fluid resuscitation could significanfly improve blood clotting function,perfusion of tissue and organ,reduce mortality,shorten resuscitation time before operation.The effective rate is better in delayed fluid resuscitation than immediate resuscitation fluid.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study effects of fluid resuscitation on thoracoabdominal injury combined with hemorrhagic traumatic shock.Method A total of 98 patients,who were treated in Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from November 2004 to December 2006,were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were diagnozed according to Surgery(fifth edition).Patients were divided into delayed fluid resuscitation group(n= 51)and immediate fluid resuscitation group(n=47).Patients in delayed fluid resuscitation group were given with balanced salt solution for the body to maintain basic requirements.Patients in immediate fluid resuscitation group were rapidly administered with a lot of isotonic crystaUoid and(or)colloid solution after admission. Hemoglobin,platelet count,hematocrit,blood lactic acid,basedeficit,preoperative resuscitation time and mortality were compared between the two groups.Paired t test and variance analysis or x~2 test were used.Results The transfusion fluid volume of delayed group and immediate group was(1586±346)ml,(3520±575)ml, respectively,with P value0.01.There was no difference on systolic blood pressure between delayed group(78±29)mmHg and immediate group(81±24)mmHg.There existed differences before operation on hemoglobin (106.21±20.91 vs 89.10±32.42 g/L),prothrombin time(11.19±2.03 vs 17.37±2.50 s),platelet count (179.44±52.19)×10~9/L vs(105.55±50.67)×10~9/L,hematocrit(28.40±2.31)% vs(20.84±2.58)%,blood lactic acid(at 30 minutes after resuscitation:1.70±0.37 vs 2.44±0.41 mmoL/L;at 60 minutes after resuscitation:3.16±0.42 us 5.73±0.68 mmol/L),basedeficit(at 30 minutes after resuscitation: -4.46±1.15vs-5.78±1.15 mmoL/L;at 60 minutes after resuscitation:-5.46±1.29 vs -9.60±2.71 mmol/L),the resuscitation time(58±26 vs 73±29)minutes,mortality was(11.3 vs 18.9)%. Delayed fluid resuscitation could significanfly improve blood clotting function,perfusion of tissue and organ,reduce mortality,shorten resuscitation time before operation.The effective rate is better in delayed fluid resuscitation than immediate resuscitation fluid.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study effects of fluid resuscitation on thoracoabdominal injury combined with hemorrhagic traumatic shock.Method A total of 98 patients,who were treated in Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from November 2004 to December 2006,were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were diagnozed according to Surgery(fifth edition).Patients were divided into delayed fluid resuscitation group(n= 51)and immediate fluid resuscitation group(n=47).Patients in delayed fluid resuscitation group were given with balanced salt solution for the body to maintain basic requirements.Patients in immediate fluid resuscitation group were rapidly administered with a lot of isotonic crystaUoid and(or)colloid solution after admission. Hemoglobin,platelet count,hematocrit,blood lactic acid,basedeficit,preoperative resuscitation time and mortality were compared between the two groups.Paired t test and variance analysis or x~2 test were used.Results The transfusion fluid volume of delayed group and immediate group was(1586±346)ml,(3520±575)ml, respectively,with P value0.01.There was no difference on systolic blood pressure between delayed group(78±29)mmHg and immediate group(81±24)mmHg.There existed differences before operation on hemoglobin (106.21±20.91 vs 89.10±32.42 g/L),prothrombin time(11.19±2.03 vs 17.37±2.50 s),platelet count (179.44±52.19)×10~9/L vs(105.55±50.67)×10~9/L,hematocrit(28.40±2.31)% vs(20.84±2.58)%,blood lactic acid(at 30 minutes after resuscitation:1.70±0.37 vs 2.44±0.41 mmoL/L;at 60 minutes after resuscitation:3.16±0.42 us 5.73±0.68 mmol/L),basedeficit(at 30 minutes after resuscitation: -4.46±1.15vs-5.78±1.15 mmoL/L;at 60 minutes after resuscitation:-5.46±1.29 vs -9.60±2.71 mmol/L),the resuscitation time(58±26 vs 73±29)minutes,mortality was(11.3 vs 18.9)%. Delayed fluid resuscitation could significanfly improve blood clotting function,perfusion of tissue and organ,reduce mortality,shorten resuscitation time before operation.The effective rate is better in delayed fluid resuscitation than immediate resuscitation fluid.

Key concepts: Medicine, Resuscitation, Hematocrit, Anesthesia, Shock (circulatory), Prothrombin time, Surgery, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of fluid resuscitation on thoracoabdominal injury combined with hemorrhagic traumatic shock — Research Paper | ScholarLens