2012Laboratory Medicine and ClinicRequires access

Value of adenosine deaminase and carcinoembryonic antigen in differential diagnosis of pleural effusion

Yanan Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of adenosine deaminase(ADA) and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion,tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion.Methods We simultaneously detected ADA and CEA in malignant pleural effusion,tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion and then analyzed the detected data.Results(1)ADA in tuberculous pleural effusion was higher than that in malignant pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion with statistical difference(P0.01).ADA in malignant pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion had no statistical difference(P0.05).CEA in malignant pleural effusion was higher than that in tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion with statistical difference(P0.01).CEA in tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion had no statistical difference(P0.05).(2)ADA′s area under the ROC curve in diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion was 0.943.CEA′s area under the ROC curve in diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion was 0.927.Conclusion The detection of ADA and CEA has high value in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion,which provides important information for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the value of adenosine deaminase(ADA) and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion,tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion.Methods We simultaneously detected ADA and CEA in malignant pleural effusion,tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion and then analyzed the detected data.Results(1)ADA in tuberculous pleural effusion was higher than that in malignant pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion with statistical difference(P0.01).ADA in malignant pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion had no statistical difference(P0.05).CEA in malignant pleural effusion was higher than that in tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion with statistical difference(P0.01).CEA in tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion had no statistical difference(P0.05).(2)ADA′s area under the ROC curve in diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion was 0.943.CEA′s area under the ROC curve in diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion was 0.927.Conclusion The detection of ADA and CEA has high value in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion,which provides important information for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the value of adenosine deaminase(ADA) and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion,tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion.Methods We simultaneously detected ADA and CEA in malignant pleural effusion,tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion and then analyzed the detected data.Results(1)ADA in tuberculous pleural effusion was higher than that in malignant pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion with statistical difference(P0.01).ADA in malignant pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion had no statistical difference(P0.05).CEA in malignant pleural effusion was higher than that in tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion with statistical difference(P0.01).CEA in tuberculous pleural effusion and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion had no statistical difference(P0.05).(2)ADA′s area under the ROC curve in diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion was 0.943.CEA′s area under the ROC curve in diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion was 0.927.Conclusion The detection of ADA and CEA has high value in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion,which provides important information for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Key concepts: Medicine, Carcinoembryonic antigen, Adenosine deaminase, Pleural effusion, Malignant pleural effusion, Differential diagnosis, Effusion, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Value of adenosine deaminase and carcinoembryonic antigen in differential diagnosis of pleural effusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens