2002Zhonghua yandibing zazhiRequires access

Evaluation of encircling scleral buckling surgery in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with vitrectomy

Jiang Cai-hu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of encircling scleral buckling surgery in rhegmatogenous retinal detachement (RRD) with vitrectomy. Methods The records of a series of 118 consecutive patients with RRD undergone encircling scleral buckling surgery and vitrectomy between 1995 1999 were reviewed. All of the patients underwent an onece vitrectomy, and they consisted of with encircling scleral buckling group and without encircling scleral buckling group. The difference of rate of retinal reattachment, and the relationship between the reattachment rate and the grade of PVR, position of retinal tear and the different intraocular tamponade substitute in both groups were analysed and compared. The average follow up period was 6.5 mons (1.5 mons 3 ys). Results The rate of retinal reattachment in this series of 118 cases was 81 4% (96/118) in which the encircling scleral buckling group accounted for 44 7% and the group without encircling scleral buckling accounted for 55.3%. There was no statistical difference of rate of retinal reattachment between both groups with PVR C, different intraocular tamponade and various positions of retinal tears, while the rate of retinal reattachment in cases of PVR D and retinal tears posterior to equator in group without encircling scleral buckling was significanthy higher than that in encircling scleral buckling group ( P 0.05). Conclusion The encircling scleral buckling procedure may be unprofitable in increasing the rate of retinal reattachment in vitrectomy for RRD.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of encircling scleral buckling surgery in rhegmatogenous retinal detachement (RRD) with vitrectomy. Methods The records of a series of 118 consecutive patients with RRD undergone encircling scleral buckling surgery and vitrectomy between 1995 1999 were reviewed. All of the patients underwent an onece vitrectomy, and they consisted of with encircling scleral buckling group and without encircling scleral buckling group. The difference of rate of retinal reattachment, and the relationship between the reattachment rate and the grade of PVR, position of retinal tear and the different intraocular tamponade substitute in both groups were analysed and compared. The average follow up period was 6.5 mons (1.5 mons 3 ys). Results The rate of retinal reattachment in this series of 118 cases was 81 4% (96/118) in which the encircling scleral buckling group accounted for 44 7% and the group without encircling scleral buckling accounted for 55.3%. There was no statistical difference of rate of retinal reattachment between both groups with PVR C, different intraocular tamponade and various positions of retinal tears, while the rate of retinal reattachment in cases of PVR D and retinal tears posterior to equator in group without encircling scleral buckling was significanthy higher than that in encircling scleral buckling group ( P 0.05). Conclusion The encircling scleral buckling procedure may be unprofitable in increasing the rate of retinal reattachment in vitrectomy for RRD.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of encircling scleral buckling surgery in rhegmatogenous retinal detachement (RRD) with vitrectomy. Methods The records of a series of 118 consecutive patients with RRD undergone encircling scleral buckling surgery and vitrectomy between 1995 1999 were reviewed. All of the patients underwent an onece vitrectomy, and they consisted of with encircling scleral buckling group and without encircling scleral buckling group. The difference of rate of retinal reattachment, and the relationship between the reattachment rate and the grade of PVR, position of retinal tear and the different intraocular tamponade substitute in both groups were analysed and compared. The average follow up period was 6.5 mons (1.5 mons 3 ys). Results The rate of retinal reattachment in this series of 118 cases was 81 4% (96/118) in which the encircling scleral buckling group accounted for 44 7% and the group without encircling scleral buckling accounted for 55.3%. There was no statistical difference of rate of retinal reattachment between both groups with PVR C, different intraocular tamponade and various positions of retinal tears, while the rate of retinal reattachment in cases of PVR D and retinal tears posterior to equator in group without encircling scleral buckling was significanthy higher than that in encircling scleral buckling group ( P 0.05). Conclusion The encircling scleral buckling procedure may be unprofitable in increasing the rate of retinal reattachment in vitrectomy for RRD.

Key concepts: Vitrectomy, Retinal Tear, Tamponade, Retinal detachment, Scleral buckling, Ophthalmology, Medicine, Retinal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of encircling scleral buckling surgery in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with vitrectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens