2013Clinical MedicineRequires access

Comparison of the rate of tracheotomy after orotracheal intubation and nasotracheal intubation for patients in ICU

Ye Tao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the retaining time of orotracheal intubation and nasotracheal intubation and compare the rate of tracheotomy after intubation in two groups.Methods Forty-two cases were randomly divided into two groups,24 cases in orotracheal intubation group,and 18 cases in nasotracheal intubation group,guided by bronchofibroscope.The retaining time of tube and the rate of tracheotomy after intubation was compared.Results The retaining time of tube in nose was significant longer than that in mouth.The rate of tracheotomy after nasotracheal intubation was less than that after orotracheal intubation.Conclusion Brochofibroscopic nasotracheal intubation is effective and has long retaining time,and part patients with nasotracheal intubation can avoid tracheotomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the retaining time of orotracheal intubation and nasotracheal intubation and compare the rate of tracheotomy after intubation in two groups.Methods Forty-two cases were randomly divided into two groups,24 cases in orotracheal intubation group,and 18 cases in nasotracheal intubation group,guided by bronchofibroscope.The retaining time of tube and the rate of tracheotomy after intubation was compared.Results The retaining time of tube in nose was significant longer than that in mouth.The rate of tracheotomy after nasotracheal intubation was less than that after orotracheal intubation.Conclusion Brochofibroscopic nasotracheal intubation is effective and has long retaining time,and part patients with nasotracheal intubation can avoid tracheotomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the retaining time of orotracheal intubation and nasotracheal intubation and compare the rate of tracheotomy after intubation in two groups.Methods Forty-two cases were randomly divided into two groups,24 cases in orotracheal intubation group,and 18 cases in nasotracheal intubation group,guided by bronchofibroscope.The retaining time of tube and the rate of tracheotomy after intubation was compared.Results The retaining time of tube in nose was significant longer than that in mouth.The rate of tracheotomy after nasotracheal intubation was less than that after orotracheal intubation.Conclusion Brochofibroscopic nasotracheal intubation is effective and has long retaining time,and part patients with nasotracheal intubation can avoid tracheotomy.

Key concepts: Nasotracheal intubation, Orotracheal intubation, Medicine, Tracheotomy, Intubation, Anesthesia, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the rate of tracheotomy after orotracheal intubation and nasotracheal intubation for patients in ICU — Research Paper | ScholarLens