Valuable Conflict and Choise of Illegal Evidence in Criminal Proceeding
Wang Yun
Abstract
Wang Yun
Abstract
The conflict between acceptance and refusal of illegal evidence is always the focus in the procedural law circle. Wether the illegal evidence has legal affection and been accepted in procedure or not embodies the directions of two values which are punishing criminal and ensuring human rights. The Exclusionary Rule of Criminal Illegal Evidence can prevent delict and safeguard human rights, so it needs improving in our country.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The conflict between acceptance and refusal of illegal evidence is always the focus in the procedural law circle. Wether the illegal evidence has legal affection and been accepted in procedure or not embodies the directions of two values which are punishing criminal and ensuring human rights. The Exclusionary Rule of Criminal Illegal Evidence can prevent delict and safeguard human rights, so it needs improving in our country.
Key concepts: Human rights, Political science, Restitution, Law, Affection, Criminology, Criminal law, Delict