2000Chinese Journal of Hospital PharmacyRequires access

Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of domestics sultamicillin tablets in volunteers

Guochun Shen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of sultamicillin tablets were compared with those of imported product Unasyn tablet. METHODS:Plasma levels of ampicillin and sulbactam were detected by HPLC UV method. RESULTS:The parameters of the two formulations for sulbactam: C maxof domestic and imported tablets were (5.6±0.8) μg·ml-1 and (6.1±1.3) μg·ml-1; T max(0.98±0.25) h and (0.91±0.19) h; AUC (12.8±1.8) mg·h·L-1and (13.1±2.4) mg·h·L-1 respectively.The relative bioavailability of domestic capsule was (98.26±10.61)%.The parameters of domestic and Unasyn tablets for ampicillin were C max (7.9±1.2) μg·ml~(-1) and (8.1±1.1) μg·ml~(-1), T max (0.97±0.28) h and (0.84±0.33) h; AUC (17.5±1.8) mg·h·L~(-1) and (17.1±1.0) mg·h·L-1.The relative bioavailability of domestic tablets was (102.20±8.47)%CONCLUSIONS:There was no significant difference between pharmacokinetic parameters for domestic and imported tablets.It was demonstrated that the two preparations were bioequivalent by one two sided tests.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE:The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of sultamicillin tablets were compared with those of imported product Unasyn tablet. METHODS:Plasma levels of ampicillin and sulbactam were detected by HPLC UV method. RESULTS:The parameters of the two formulations for sulbactam: C maxof domestic and imported tablets were (5.6±0.8) μg·ml-1 and (6.1±1.3) μg·ml-1; T max(0.98±0.25) h and (0.91±0.19) h; AUC (12.8±1.8) mg·h·L-1and (13.1±2.4) mg·h·L-1 respectively.The relative bioavailability of domestic capsule was (98.26±10.61)%.The parameters of domestic and Unasyn tablets for ampicillin were C max (7.9±1.2) μg·ml~(-1) and (8.1±1.1) μg·ml~(-1), T max (0.97±0.28) h and (0.84±0.33) h; AUC (17.5±1.8) mg·h·L~(-1) and (17.1±1.0) mg·h·L-1.The relative bioavailability of domestic tablets was (102.20±8.47)%CONCLUSIONS:There was no significant difference between pharmacokinetic parameters for domestic and imported tablets.It was demonstrated that the two preparations were bioequivalent by one two sided tests.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE:The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of sultamicillin tablets were compared with those of imported product Unasyn tablet. METHODS:Plasma levels of ampicillin and sulbactam were detected by HPLC UV method. RESULTS:The parameters of the two formulations for sulbactam: C maxof domestic and imported tablets were (5.6±0.8) μg·ml-1 and (6.1±1.3) μg·ml-1; T max(0.98±0.25) h and (0.91±0.19) h; AUC (12.8±1.8) mg·h·L-1and (13.1±2.4) mg·h·L-1 respectively.The relative bioavailability of domestic capsule was (98.26±10.61)%.The parameters of domestic and Unasyn tablets for ampicillin were C max (7.9±1.2) μg·ml~(-1) and (8.1±1.1) μg·ml~(-1), T max (0.97±0.28) h and (0.84±0.33) h; AUC (17.5±1.8) mg·h·L~(-1) and (17.1±1.0) mg·h·L-1.The relative bioavailability of domestic tablets was (102.20±8.47)%CONCLUSIONS:There was no significant difference between pharmacokinetic parameters for domestic and imported tablets.It was demonstrated that the two preparations were bioequivalent by one two sided tests.

Key concepts: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence, Pharmacokinetics, Chemistry, Capsule, Pharmacology, Plasma concentration, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of domestics sultamicillin tablets in volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens