2010•Science Technology and IndustryRequires access

An Empirical Study of China’s Income Convergence Hypothesis across the Provincial Regions

Jinghan Cai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Based on China's 31 provincial-level panel data of regional per capita income from 2000 to 2008, this paper applies a variety of panel unit root test methods and different benchmarks to test the income convergence hypothesis. The results find that, taking Beijing’s per capita income as a benchmark, there exists only the conditional convergence and no absolute convergence whether it is for the whole country or three single regions, whether urban or rural areas. And to take the national per capita income as a benchmark, there exists absolute convergence as well as conditional convergence for both urban and rural areas at the national level. In the case of three single regions, when taking the group average as the benchmark, there exists absolute convergence in urban areas while for the rural areas the absolute convergence does not exist. Further, there exists conditional convergence in Eastern and Western areas but not in Middle area.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on China's 31 provincial-level panel data of regional per capita income from 2000 to 2008, this paper applies a variety of panel unit root test methods and different benchmarks to test the income convergence hypothesis. The results find that, taking Beijing’s per capita income as a benchmark, there exists only the conditional convergence and no absolute convergence whether it is for the whole country or three single regions, whether urban or rural areas. And to take the national per capita income as a benchmark, there exists absolute convergence as well as conditional convergence for both urban and rural areas at the national level. In the case of three single regions, when taking the group average as the benchmark, there exists absolute convergence in urban areas while for the rural areas the absolute convergence does not exist. Further, there exists conditional convergence in Eastern and Western areas but not in Middle area.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on China's 31 provincial-level panel data of regional per capita income from 2000 to 2008, this paper applies a variety of panel unit root test methods and different benchmarks to test the income convergence hypothesis. The results find that, taking Beijing’s per capita income as a benchmark, there exists only the conditional convergence and no absolute convergence whether it is for the whole country or three single regions, whether urban or rural areas. And to take the national per capita income as a benchmark, there exists absolute convergence as well as conditional convergence for both urban and rural areas at the national level. In the case of three single regions, when taking the group average as the benchmark, there exists absolute convergence in urban areas while for the rural areas the absolute convergence does not exist. Further, there exists conditional convergence in Eastern and Western areas but not in Middle area.

Key concepts: Conditional convergence, Beijing, Convergence (economics), Absolute convergence, Econometrics, Unit root test, Per capita, China

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Empirical Study of China’s Income Convergence Hypothesis across the Provincial Regions — Research Paper | ScholarLens