CONVERGENCE OF INCOME ACROSS PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES
David A. Latzko, York Campus
Abstract
Open-access reader
David A. Latzko, York Campus
Abstract
Open-access reader
The neoclassical growth model implies that if two economies have the same preferences and technology, the poorer country will tend to grow faster in per capita terms. The relatively homogeneous counties of Pennsylvania provide an excellent test of the model's convergence predictions. There is no evidence of absolute convergence of income levels among Pennsylvania counties. The divergence between the very highest and very lowest income counties is due to changes in relative county wages. I utilize a set of panel data to properly account for individual effects, and find a conditional convergence rate of 2 percent.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The neoclassical growth model implies that if two economies have the same preferences and technology, the poorer country will tend to grow faster in per capita terms. The relatively homogeneous counties of Pennsylvania provide an excellent test of the model's convergence predictions. There is no evidence of absolute convergence of income levels among Pennsylvania counties. The divergence between the very highest and very lowest income counties is due to changes in relative county wages. I utilize a set of panel data to properly account for individual effects, and find a conditional convergence rate of 2 percent.
Key concepts: Romer, Conditional convergence, Convergence (economics), Per capita, Economics, Per capita income, Econometrics, Demographic economics