Application of remifentanil combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for colonoscopy
XU Zhao-y
Abstract
XU Zhao-y
Abstract
Objective: To study and compare the anesthetic effect and safety of remlfentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for out-patient clinic colonoscopy. Methods: 160 patients underwent out-patient clinic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, 80 cases observed group were injected 0.1mg of 2% fentanyl intravenously,followed by propofol of 1.5~2 mg·kg-1 intravenous injection, maintained by 130-180μg· kg-1·min-1 propofol.Control group B (n=80) were only injected propofol intravenously.Colonoscopy was undergone when patient was in the fourth grade anesthesia state.Heart rate (HR)and Sp02 were continuously monitored. Compare with patients reaction and physical sign,the time for complete colonoscopy,average recovery time and success rate were recorded. Results: :Compared with control group, there were less side effect in observed group, and the acceptance rate is higher than that of control group (98.75%). There were significant differences of the DBP, SBP and HR in control group (P 0.05), and the average recovery time was 15 min. Conclusion: The anesthetic side effect and safety of fentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for colonoscopy is less than propofol intravenous anesthesia only. It had comparable effectiveness and feasibility.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To study and compare the anesthetic effect and safety of remlfentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for out-patient clinic colonoscopy. Methods: 160 patients underwent out-patient clinic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, 80 cases observed group were injected 0.1mg of 2% fentanyl intravenously,followed by propofol of 1.5~2 mg·kg-1 intravenous injection, maintained by 130-180μg· kg-1·min-1 propofol.Control group B (n=80) were only injected propofol intravenously.Colonoscopy was undergone when patient was in the fourth grade anesthesia state.Heart rate (HR)and Sp02 were continuously monitored. Compare with patients reaction and physical sign,the time for complete colonoscopy,average recovery time and success rate were recorded. Results: :Compared with control group, there were less side effect in observed group, and the acceptance rate is higher than that of control group (98.75%). There were significant differences of the DBP, SBP and HR in control group (P 0.05), and the average recovery time was 15 min. Conclusion: The anesthetic side effect and safety of fentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for colonoscopy is less than propofol intravenous anesthesia only. It had comparable effectiveness and feasibility.
Key concepts: Medicine, Propofol, Colonoscopy, Anesthesia, Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Anesthetic, Sedation