2008•Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical CollegeRequires access

Application of remifentanil combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for colonoscopy

XU Zhao-y

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To study and compare the anesthetic effect and safety of remlfentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for out-patient clinic colonoscopy. Methods: 160 patients underwent out-patient clinic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, 80 cases observed group were injected 0.1mg of 2% fentanyl intravenously,followed by propofol of 1.5~2 mg·kg-1 intravenous injection, maintained by 130-180μg· kg-1·min-1 propofol.Control group B (n=80) were only injected propofol intravenously.Colonoscopy was undergone when patient was in the fourth grade anesthesia state.Heart rate (HR)and Sp02 were continuously monitored. Compare with patients reaction and physical sign,the time for complete colonoscopy,average recovery time and success rate were recorded. Results: :Compared with control group, there were less side effect in observed group, and the acceptance rate is higher than that of control group (98.75%). There were significant differences of the DBP, SBP and HR in control group (P 0.05), and the average recovery time was 15 min. Conclusion: The anesthetic side effect and safety of fentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for colonoscopy is less than propofol intravenous anesthesia only. It had comparable effectiveness and feasibility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To study and compare the anesthetic effect and safety of remlfentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for out-patient clinic colonoscopy. Methods: 160 patients underwent out-patient clinic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, 80 cases observed group were injected 0.1mg of 2% fentanyl intravenously,followed by propofol of 1.5~2 mg·kg-1 intravenous injection, maintained by 130-180μg· kg-1·min-1 propofol.Control group B (n=80) were only injected propofol intravenously.Colonoscopy was undergone when patient was in the fourth grade anesthesia state.Heart rate (HR)and Sp02 were continuously monitored. Compare with patients reaction and physical sign,the time for complete colonoscopy,average recovery time and success rate were recorded. Results: :Compared with control group, there were less side effect in observed group, and the acceptance rate is higher than that of control group (98.75%). There were significant differences of the DBP, SBP and HR in control group (P 0.05), and the average recovery time was 15 min. Conclusion: The anesthetic side effect and safety of fentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for colonoscopy is less than propofol intravenous anesthesia only. It had comparable effectiveness and feasibility.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To study and compare the anesthetic effect and safety of remlfentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for out-patient clinic colonoscopy. Methods: 160 patients underwent out-patient clinic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, 80 cases observed group were injected 0.1mg of 2% fentanyl intravenously,followed by propofol of 1.5~2 mg·kg-1 intravenous injection, maintained by 130-180μg· kg-1·min-1 propofol.Control group B (n=80) were only injected propofol intravenously.Colonoscopy was undergone when patient was in the fourth grade anesthesia state.Heart rate (HR)and Sp02 were continuously monitored. Compare with patients reaction and physical sign,the time for complete colonoscopy,average recovery time and success rate were recorded. Results: :Compared with control group, there were less side effect in observed group, and the acceptance rate is higher than that of control group (98.75%). There were significant differences of the DBP, SBP and HR in control group (P 0.05), and the average recovery time was 15 min. Conclusion: The anesthetic side effect and safety of fentanll combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for colonoscopy is less than propofol intravenous anesthesia only. It had comparable effectiveness and feasibility.

Key concepts: Medicine, Propofol, Colonoscopy, Anesthesia, Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Anesthetic, Sedation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of remifentanil combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia for colonoscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens