2015Chengshi guihuaRequires access

PROBLEMS AND COUNTERMEASURES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARTICLE 64 OF THE URBAN-RURAL PLANNING LAW: A READING OF “GUIDANCE FOR STANDARDIZING ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY DISCRETION IN URBAN AND RURAL PLANNING”

Ji Wu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses the content of Article 64 of the Urban-Rural Planning Law by reading the file Guidance for Standardizing Administrative Penalty Discretion in Urban and Rural Planning. This paper distinguishes two kinds of situations between barely and impossibly and their processes; it puts forward different understanding on the existing views of some scholars and practitioners, and attaches great importance to correction, demolition and other measures in eliminating the influence on plan implementation. The paper suggests that demolition should be the first priority when correction is impossible, and penalty in this case should be an auxiliary administrative tool; post-registration should be strictly limited.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper discusses the content of Article 64 of the Urban-Rural Planning Law by reading the file Guidance for Standardizing Administrative Penalty Discretion in Urban and Rural Planning. This paper distinguishes two kinds of situations between barely and impossibly and their processes; it puts forward different understanding on the existing views of some scholars and practitioners, and attaches great importance to correction, demolition and other measures in eliminating the influence on plan implementation. The paper suggests that demolition should be the first priority when correction is impossible, and penalty in this case should be an auxiliary administrative tool; post-registration should be strictly limited.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper discusses the content of Article 64 of the Urban-Rural Planning Law by reading the file Guidance for Standardizing Administrative Penalty Discretion in Urban and Rural Planning. This paper distinguishes two kinds of situations between barely and impossibly and their processes; it puts forward different understanding on the existing views of some scholars and practitioners, and attaches great importance to correction, demolition and other measures in eliminating the influence on plan implementation. The paper suggests that demolition should be the first priority when correction is impossible, and penalty in this case should be an auxiliary administrative tool; post-registration should be strictly limited.

Key concepts: Discretion, Plan (archaeology), Reading (process), Demolition, Law, Administrative discretion, Administrative law, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PROBLEMS AND COUNTERMEASURES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARTICLE 64 OF THE URBAN-RURAL PLANNING LAW: A READING OF “GUIDANCE FOR STANDARDIZING ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY DISCRETION IN URBAN AND RURAL PLANNING” — Research Paper | ScholarLens