2008•PubMedRequires access

[Efficacy of alternating triple therapy on relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].

Hong Tian, Jie Chen, Ying Wu, Lili Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Treatment of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) remains difficult. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of alternating triple therapy (ATT), alternating administration of ASHAP, m-BACOD, and MINE regimens every 3 weeks, on relapsed or refractory NHL. METHODS: Clinical data of 38 patients with relapsed or refractory NHL (28 relapsed NHL and 10 refractory NHL) treated with ATT were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 10 (26.3%) achieved complete remission and 12 (31.6%) achieved partial remission; the overall response rate was 57.9%. The response rate was 60.0% in B-cell lymphoma patients and 55.6% in T-cell lymphoma patients; it was 65.4% in the patients of 60 years old. With a median follow-up of 11 months, the 1-and 2-year survival rates were 42.1% and 13.2%, respectively. The major adverse event was myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: ATT is effective and well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. Further clinical study is warranted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Treatment of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) remains difficult. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of alternating triple therapy (ATT), alternating administration of ASHAP, m-BACOD, and MINE regimens every 3 weeks, on relapsed or refractory NHL. METHODS: Clinical data of 38 patients with relapsed or refractory NHL (28 relapsed NHL and 10 refractory NHL) treated with ATT were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 10 (26.3%) achieved complete remission and 12 (31.6%) achieved partial remission; the overall response rate was 57.9%. The response rate was 60.0% in B-cell lymphoma patients and 55.6% in T-cell lymphoma patients; it was 65.4% in the patients of 60 years old. With a median follow-up of 11 months, the 1-and 2-year survival rates were 42.1% and 13.2%, respectively. The major adverse event was myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: ATT is effective and well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. Further clinical study is warranted.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Treatment of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) remains difficult. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of alternating triple therapy (ATT), alternating administration of ASHAP, m-BACOD, and MINE regimens every 3 weeks, on relapsed or refractory NHL. METHODS: Clinical data of 38 patients with relapsed or refractory NHL (28 relapsed NHL and 10 refractory NHL) treated with ATT were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 10 (26.3%) achieved complete remission and 12 (31.6%) achieved partial remission; the overall response rate was 57.9%. The response rate was 60.0% in B-cell lymphoma patients and 55.6% in T-cell lymphoma patients; it was 65.4% in the patients of 60 years old. With a median follow-up of 11 months, the 1-and 2-year survival rates were 42.1% and 13.2%, respectively. The major adverse event was myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: ATT is effective and well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. Further clinical study is warranted.

Key concepts: Refractory (planetary science), Medicine, Internal medicine, Lymphoma, Adverse effect, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Gastroenterology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Efficacy of alternating triple therapy on relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens