A Comparison of Moral Education of Confucius and Laozi
Hong Li
Abstract
Hong Li
Abstract
Moral education of Confucius and Laozi, each of which has its own strong points and is mutually complementary, has become the important content of our traditional moral education and was the theoretical origins of the traditionalRule by moralityin the ancient times in China. In the paper, the writer compares the moral education of confucius and Laozi from the three aspects:philosophical basis, moral content and moral method, which provides use for critically inheriting out traditional moral education and implementing the general plan of Rule by morality.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Moral education of Confucius and Laozi, each of which has its own strong points and is mutually complementary, has become the important content of our traditional moral education and was the theoretical origins of the traditionalRule by moralityin the ancient times in China. In the paper, the writer compares the moral education of confucius and Laozi from the three aspects:philosophical basis, moral content and moral method, which provides use for critically inheriting out traditional moral education and implementing the general plan of Rule by morality.
Key concepts: Morality, Moral education, Plan (archaeology), China, Epistemology, Moral disengagement, Content (measure theory), Moral development