2005Dalian Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Randomized controlled clinical trial on Roxithromycin Retard versus Roxithromycin in treatment of acute bacterial infections of respiratory system

Lihua Cao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveIn order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Roxithromycin Retard in the treatment of acute bacterial infections of respiratory system.[Methods]A randomized double-blind labeled controlled clinical trial was conducted for the treatment of 204 patients with respiratory tract infections. In the study,102 patients were enrolled in Roxithromycin Retard group while 102 patients were enrolled in Roxithromycin group. The dosage of Roxithromycin Retard was 300 mg,once daily orally while the dosage of Roxithromycin was 150 mg twice daily orally. The duration of treatment was 7~10 days in both groups.[Results]The results showed that the efficacy rates were 90.2% for Roxithromycin Retard group and 89.2% for Roxithromycin group, the bacterial clearance rates were 97.55% and 97.67%,respectively. The incidence of adverse reaction was 12.75% and 9.8%,respectively.[Conclusion]Roxithromycin Retard is effective and safe drug for acute bacterial infections of respiratory system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ObjectiveIn order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Roxithromycin Retard in the treatment of acute bacterial infections of respiratory system.[Methods]A randomized double-blind labeled controlled clinical trial was conducted for the treatment of 204 patients with respiratory tract infections. In the study,102 patients were enrolled in Roxithromycin Retard group while 102 patients were enrolled in Roxithromycin group. The dosage of Roxithromycin Retard was 300 mg,once daily orally while the dosage of Roxithromycin was 150 mg twice daily orally. The duration of treatment was 7~10 days in both groups.[Results]The results showed that the efficacy rates were 90.2% for Roxithromycin Retard group and 89.2% for Roxithromycin group, the bacterial clearance rates were 97.55% and 97.67%,respectively. The incidence of adverse reaction was 12.75% and 9.8%,respectively.[Conclusion]Roxithromycin Retard is effective and safe drug for acute bacterial infections of respiratory system.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ObjectiveIn order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Roxithromycin Retard in the treatment of acute bacterial infections of respiratory system.[Methods]A randomized double-blind labeled controlled clinical trial was conducted for the treatment of 204 patients with respiratory tract infections. In the study,102 patients were enrolled in Roxithromycin Retard group while 102 patients were enrolled in Roxithromycin group. The dosage of Roxithromycin Retard was 300 mg,once daily orally while the dosage of Roxithromycin was 150 mg twice daily orally. The duration of treatment was 7~10 days in both groups.[Results]The results showed that the efficacy rates were 90.2% for Roxithromycin Retard group and 89.2% for Roxithromycin group, the bacterial clearance rates were 97.55% and 97.67%,respectively. The incidence of adverse reaction was 12.75% and 9.8%,respectively.[Conclusion]Roxithromycin Retard is effective and safe drug for acute bacterial infections of respiratory system.

Key concepts: Roxithromycin, Medicine, Adverse effect, Respiratory tract infections, Clinical efficacy, Randomized controlled trial, Clinical trial, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Randomized controlled clinical trial on Roxithromycin Retard versus Roxithromycin in treatment of acute bacterial infections of respiratory system — Research Paper | ScholarLens