2008Chinese Journal of Birth Health & HeredityRequires access

The application research of operative technology in detecting thalassemia

Peixuan Lin

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Objective:By 3 means of MCV,Red cell osmotic fragility(RCOF) test,Hemoglobin(Hb) electrophoresis to screen α and β thalassemia,and to compare their sensitivity and specificity.Methods: 322 samples of uncertain thalassemia and 100 samples of non-thalassemia verified by molecular biologic technique were detected by Hb electrophoresis and gene test. Take gene test to be the gold standard.Results:The sensitivity and specificity of 3 tests were as follow: Those of MCV were 98.8% and 72.4%,RCOF were 78.5% and 83.8%,Hb electrophoresis were 98.4% and 90.2%. There were significant differences of sensitivity between the first 2 tests. Conclusion: MCV test is more sensitive than RCOF test in screening out thalassemia,and it′s more economical and convenient to be adopted as the first choice to detect thalassemia in poorer and less complete hospitals. The veracity can be increased if Hb electrophoresis cooperates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:By 3 means of MCV,Red cell osmotic fragility(RCOF) test,Hemoglobin(Hb) electrophoresis to screen α and β thalassemia,and to compare their sensitivity and specificity.Methods: 322 samples of uncertain thalassemia and 100 samples of non-thalassemia verified by molecular biologic technique were detected by Hb electrophoresis and gene test. Take gene test to be the gold standard.Results:The sensitivity and specificity of 3 tests were as follow: Those of MCV were 98.8% and 72.4%,RCOF were 78.5% and 83.8%,Hb electrophoresis were 98.4% and 90.2%. There were significant differences of sensitivity between the first 2 tests. Conclusion: MCV test is more sensitive than RCOF test in screening out thalassemia,and it′s more economical and convenient to be adopted as the first choice to detect thalassemia in poorer and less complete hospitals. The veracity can be increased if Hb electrophoresis cooperates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:By 3 means of MCV,Red cell osmotic fragility(RCOF) test,Hemoglobin(Hb) electrophoresis to screen α and β thalassemia,and to compare their sensitivity and specificity.Methods: 322 samples of uncertain thalassemia and 100 samples of non-thalassemia verified by molecular biologic technique were detected by Hb electrophoresis and gene test. Take gene test to be the gold standard.Results:The sensitivity and specificity of 3 tests were as follow: Those of MCV were 98.8% and 72.4%,RCOF were 78.5% and 83.8%,Hb electrophoresis were 98.4% and 90.2%. There were significant differences of sensitivity between the first 2 tests. Conclusion: MCV test is more sensitive than RCOF test in screening out thalassemia,and it′s more economical and convenient to be adopted as the first choice to detect thalassemia in poorer and less complete hospitals. The veracity can be increased if Hb electrophoresis cooperates.

Key concepts: Thalassemia, Erythrocyte fragility, Gold standard (test), Hemoglobin electrophoresis, Hemoglobin, Medicine, Molecular biology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The application research of operative technology in detecting thalassemia — Research Paper | ScholarLens