2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Seismic stability analysis of downstream slope on the rockfill dams

Chi Shi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Sweden circular method and the Bishop simplified method were used commonly on seismic stability analysis of rockfill dam slope. The shear strength of the soil is originally expressed by MohrCoulomb failure criterion as a linear function. But many tests show the shear strength of the rockfill material is a nonlinear function of the normal stress. Some papers have analyzed the seismic stability of the rockfill dam slope by the nonlinear shear strength of the rockfill material. But the suited safety factor criterion was not clarified. In this paper, stability safety factors of the rockfill dam slope are compared by finite element method and limiting equilibrium method by the use of linear and nonlinear shear strength. The result shows the safety factor of Bishop method is larger 2%~10% than Sweden circular method, and factor of nonlinear shear strength is larger 15%~25% than linear. So the safety factor criterion of nonlinear shear strength should larger than linear.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Sweden circular method and the Bishop simplified method were used commonly on seismic stability analysis of rockfill dam slope. The shear strength of the soil is originally expressed by MohrCoulomb failure criterion as a linear function. But many tests show the shear strength of the rockfill material is a nonlinear function of the normal stress. Some papers have analyzed the seismic stability of the rockfill dam slope by the nonlinear shear strength of the rockfill material. But the suited safety factor criterion was not clarified. In this paper, stability safety factors of the rockfill dam slope are compared by finite element method and limiting equilibrium method by the use of linear and nonlinear shear strength. The result shows the safety factor of Bishop method is larger 2%~10% than Sweden circular method, and factor of nonlinear shear strength is larger 15%~25% than linear. So the safety factor criterion of nonlinear shear strength should larger than linear.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Sweden circular method and the Bishop simplified method were used commonly on seismic stability analysis of rockfill dam slope. The shear strength of the soil is originally expressed by MohrCoulomb failure criterion as a linear function. But many tests show the shear strength of the rockfill material is a nonlinear function of the normal stress. Some papers have analyzed the seismic stability of the rockfill dam slope by the nonlinear shear strength of the rockfill material. But the suited safety factor criterion was not clarified. In this paper, stability safety factors of the rockfill dam slope are compared by finite element method and limiting equilibrium method by the use of linear and nonlinear shear strength. The result shows the safety factor of Bishop method is larger 2%~10% than Sweden circular method, and factor of nonlinear shear strength is larger 15%~25% than linear. So the safety factor criterion of nonlinear shear strength should larger than linear.

Key concepts: Safety factor, Geotechnical engineering, Factor of safety, Shear strength (soil), Nonlinear system, Structural engineering, Shear (geology), Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seismic stability analysis of downstream slope on the rockfill dams — Research Paper | ScholarLens