Randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial on tazarotene cream versus adapaline gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris
Baoxi Wang
Abstract
Baoxi Wang
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical tazarotene 0.1% cream in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Methods A multicenter randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial was conducted. The patients with mild-to-moderate facial acne vulgaris were treated with either 0.1 % tazarotene cream or 0.1 % adapaline gel once daily for 8 weeks. Study visits took place at baseline and week 2,4 and 8. A total of 142 patients were enrolled in present clinical study.Among them, 71 patients were topically treated with 0.1 % tazarotene cream, in whicd 64 patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Seventy-one patients were topically treated with 0.1 % adapaline gel, in which 67 patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Results The results showed that total effective rate was 72.3% for tazarotene cream group, 62.7% for adapaline gel group(P0.05), respectively.Mild-to-moderate local skin irritation was found in 28.70% in tazarotene cream group and 23.50% in adapaline gel group(P0.05), respectively.Conclusion The present study suggests that 0.1% tazarotene cream was effective and safe for the treatment of acne vulgaris.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical tazarotene 0.1% cream in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Methods A multicenter randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial was conducted. The patients with mild-to-moderate facial acne vulgaris were treated with either 0.1 % tazarotene cream or 0.1 % adapaline gel once daily for 8 weeks. Study visits took place at baseline and week 2,4 and 8. A total of 142 patients were enrolled in present clinical study.Among them, 71 patients were topically treated with 0.1 % tazarotene cream, in whicd 64 patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Seventy-one patients were topically treated with 0.1 % adapaline gel, in which 67 patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Results The results showed that total effective rate was 72.3% for tazarotene cream group, 62.7% for adapaline gel group(P0.05), respectively.Mild-to-moderate local skin irritation was found in 28.70% in tazarotene cream group and 23.50% in adapaline gel group(P0.05), respectively.Conclusion The present study suggests that 0.1% tazarotene cream was effective and safe for the treatment of acne vulgaris.
Key concepts: Tazarotene, Acne, Medicine, Dermatology, Clinical trial, Irritation, Randomized controlled trial, Multicenter study