2003Journal of Jiangsu UniversityRequires access

Notes on Reading Wen Xuan

Mu Ke

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Three important issues are under discussion in the field of Wen Xuan as a literary genre. First, it traces back to thirtyseven literary forms as demonstrated in Xiao Tong′s Wen Xuan as a point of departure, among which Form Seven (qi), that is, any literary form started with Chinese numerical seven becomes the center of discussion. In addition, it places Form Seven in the historical context and discusses its influence on the latter writings. Second, it tries to do meticulous textual criticism about Wen Xuan Pang Zheng and finds it as a serendipitous discovery the original author of the text, Liang Zhangju. Third, it reassesses the views by Su Shi's comments on Wen Xuan: on one hand, Su Shi pointed out the errors made by Xiao Tong; on the other, Su Shi's comments, inevitably tinged with his biases, failed to offer a fair and judicious review. 

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three important issues are under discussion in the field of Wen Xuan as a literary genre. First, it traces back to thirtyseven literary forms as demonstrated in Xiao Tong′s Wen Xuan as a point of departure, among which Form Seven (qi), that is, any literary form started with Chinese numerical seven becomes the center of discussion. In addition, it places Form Seven in the historical context and discusses its influence on the latter writings. Second, it tries to do meticulous textual criticism about Wen Xuan Pang Zheng and finds it as a serendipitous discovery the original author of the text, Liang Zhangju. Third, it reassesses the views by Su Shi's comments on Wen Xuan: on one hand, Su Shi pointed out the errors made by Xiao Tong; on the other, Su Shi's comments, inevitably tinged with his biases, failed to offer a fair and judicious review. 

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three important issues are under discussion in the field of Wen Xuan as a literary genre. First, it traces back to thirtyseven literary forms as demonstrated in Xiao Tong′s Wen Xuan as a point of departure, among which Form Seven (qi), that is, any literary form started with Chinese numerical seven becomes the center of discussion. In addition, it places Form Seven in the historical context and discusses its influence on the latter writings. Second, it tries to do meticulous textual criticism about Wen Xuan Pang Zheng and finds it as a serendipitous discovery the original author of the text, Liang Zhangju. Third, it reassesses the views by Su Shi's comments on Wen Xuan: on one hand, Su Shi pointed out the errors made by Xiao Tong; on the other, Su Shi's comments, inevitably tinged with his biases, failed to offer a fair and judicious review. 

Key concepts: Literature, Reading (process), Context (archaeology), Point (geometry), Criticism, History, Textual criticism, Field (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Notes on Reading Wen Xuan — Research Paper | ScholarLens