2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and dynamic hip screw in treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture:a contrast study

Rujun Zuo

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate and compare the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) and dynamic hip screw(DHS) in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture.Methods 93 cases were divided into two groups according to surgical methods.51 cases were treated with PFNA,and 42 cases were treated with DHS.The clinical effect were observed.Results All the patients were followed up for 3~15(9.6±3.2) months,and firm union of fractures were obtained in all the cases.The average operation time was(60.2±15.4)min in PFNA group,shorter than that of(117.8±32.6)min in DHS group(t=4.521,P0.05);and the first exercise time in PFNA group were shorter than that in DHS group((3.6±0.6)d vs(7.1±2.2)d,t=4.769,P0.05).Complications happened in 12 cases in DHS group: 6 cases with screw cutting out femoral neck and 6 cases with coxa vara.While in PFNA group,one case died of postoperative heart failure.There was significant difference in complications between the two groups(χ2=4.001,P0.05).Conclusions PFNA has the advantages of less surgical trauma,less complications,and shorter operation time.So it is a useful device in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate and compare the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) and dynamic hip screw(DHS) in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture.Methods 93 cases were divided into two groups according to surgical methods.51 cases were treated with PFNA,and 42 cases were treated with DHS.The clinical effect were observed.Results All the patients were followed up for 3~15(9.6±3.2) months,and firm union of fractures were obtained in all the cases.The average operation time was(60.2±15.4)min in PFNA group,shorter than that of(117.8±32.6)min in DHS group(t=4.521,P0.05);and the first exercise time in PFNA group were shorter than that in DHS group((3.6±0.6)d vs(7.1±2.2)d,t=4.769,P0.05).Complications happened in 12 cases in DHS group: 6 cases with screw cutting out femoral neck and 6 cases with coxa vara.While in PFNA group,one case died of postoperative heart failure.There was significant difference in complications between the two groups(χ2=4.001,P0.05).Conclusions PFNA has the advantages of less surgical trauma,less complications,and shorter operation time.So it is a useful device in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate and compare the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) and dynamic hip screw(DHS) in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture.Methods 93 cases were divided into two groups according to surgical methods.51 cases were treated with PFNA,and 42 cases were treated with DHS.The clinical effect were observed.Results All the patients were followed up for 3~15(9.6±3.2) months,and firm union of fractures were obtained in all the cases.The average operation time was(60.2±15.4)min in PFNA group,shorter than that of(117.8±32.6)min in DHS group(t=4.521,P0.05);and the first exercise time in PFNA group were shorter than that in DHS group((3.6±0.6)d vs(7.1±2.2)d,t=4.769,P0.05).Complications happened in 12 cases in DHS group: 6 cases with screw cutting out femoral neck and 6 cases with coxa vara.While in PFNA group,one case died of postoperative heart failure.There was significant difference in complications between the two groups(χ2=4.001,P0.05).Conclusions PFNA has the advantages of less surgical trauma,less complications,and shorter operation time.So it is a useful device in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dynamic hip screw, Intertrochanteric fracture, Surgery, Coxa vara, Femoral neck, External rotation, Femur

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and dynamic hip screw in treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture:a contrast study — Research Paper | ScholarLens