Evaluation and curative effect analysis of diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma
Ying Shi
Abstract
Ying Shi
Abstract
Objective To investigate the characteristics of trauma score in diaphragm injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma, and evaluate treatment quality.?Methods From 1970 to 1999,28 patients with diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma were treated and evaluated retrospectively by hospital trauma scoring.?Results ISS was significantly correlative with PTI, TRISS and ASCOT.PTI was correlative only with TRISS. Each patient's probability of survival was 0.5 or more than 0.5. That is to say, all the patients should have survived, however, in fact, there were two deaths. There was significant difference in RTS and ASCOT between shock group and non shock group.?Conclusions(1)?ISS is more reasonable than PTI in evaluating diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma,and ISS≥20 should be considered as standard of severe trauma.(2)?There is no significant difference in anatomic damage (ISS, PTI) between shock group and non shock group. This is an important characteristic in the injuries.(3)?It is necessary to improve the understanding of the injuries and levels of treatment.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the characteristics of trauma score in diaphragm injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma, and evaluate treatment quality.?Methods From 1970 to 1999,28 patients with diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma were treated and evaluated retrospectively by hospital trauma scoring.?Results ISS was significantly correlative with PTI, TRISS and ASCOT.PTI was correlative only with TRISS. Each patient's probability of survival was 0.5 or more than 0.5. That is to say, all the patients should have survived, however, in fact, there were two deaths. There was significant difference in RTS and ASCOT between shock group and non shock group.?Conclusions(1)?ISS is more reasonable than PTI in evaluating diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma,and ISS≥20 should be considered as standard of severe trauma.(2)?There is no significant difference in anatomic damage (ISS, PTI) between shock group and non shock group. This is an important characteristic in the injuries.(3)?It is necessary to improve the understanding of the injuries and levels of treatment.
Key concepts: Medicine, Thoracic trauma, Penetrating trauma, Diaphragmatic breathing, Penetrating wounds, Shock (circulatory), Surgery, Diaphragm (acoustics)