2001Journal of Traumatic SurgeryRequires access

Evaluation and curative effect analysis of diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma

Ying Shi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the characteristics of trauma score in diaphragm injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma, and evaluate treatment quality.?Methods From 1970 to 1999,28 patients with diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma were treated and evaluated retrospectively by hospital trauma scoring.?Results ISS was significantly correlative with PTI, TRISS and ASCOT.PTI was correlative only with TRISS. Each patient's probability of survival was 0.5 or more than 0.5. That is to say, all the patients should have survived, however, in fact, there were two deaths. There was significant difference in RTS and ASCOT between shock group and non shock group.?Conclusions(1)?ISS is more reasonable than PTI in evaluating diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma,and ISS≥20 should be considered as standard of severe trauma.(2)?There is no significant difference in anatomic damage (ISS, PTI) between shock group and non shock group. This is an important characteristic in the injuries.(3)?It is necessary to improve the understanding of the injuries and levels of treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the characteristics of trauma score in diaphragm injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma, and evaluate treatment quality.?Methods From 1970 to 1999,28 patients with diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma were treated and evaluated retrospectively by hospital trauma scoring.?Results ISS was significantly correlative with PTI, TRISS and ASCOT.PTI was correlative only with TRISS. Each patient's probability of survival was 0.5 or more than 0.5. That is to say, all the patients should have survived, however, in fact, there were two deaths. There was significant difference in RTS and ASCOT between shock group and non shock group.?Conclusions(1)?ISS is more reasonable than PTI in evaluating diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma,and ISS≥20 should be considered as standard of severe trauma.(2)?There is no significant difference in anatomic damage (ISS, PTI) between shock group and non shock group. This is an important characteristic in the injuries.(3)?It is necessary to improve the understanding of the injuries and levels of treatment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the characteristics of trauma score in diaphragm injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma, and evaluate treatment quality.?Methods From 1970 to 1999,28 patients with diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma were treated and evaluated retrospectively by hospital trauma scoring.?Results ISS was significantly correlative with PTI, TRISS and ASCOT.PTI was correlative only with TRISS. Each patient's probability of survival was 0.5 or more than 0.5. That is to say, all the patients should have survived, however, in fact, there were two deaths. There was significant difference in RTS and ASCOT between shock group and non shock group.?Conclusions(1)?ISS is more reasonable than PTI in evaluating diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma,and ISS≥20 should be considered as standard of severe trauma.(2)?There is no significant difference in anatomic damage (ISS, PTI) between shock group and non shock group. This is an important characteristic in the injuries.(3)?It is necessary to improve the understanding of the injuries and levels of treatment.

Key concepts: Medicine, Thoracic trauma, Penetrating trauma, Diaphragmatic breathing, Penetrating wounds, Shock (circulatory), Surgery, Diaphragm (acoustics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation and curative effect analysis of diaphragmatic injuries caused by penetrating thoracic trauma — Research Paper | ScholarLens