2009Chinese Journal of Practical StomatologyRequires access

Clinical application of Ceramage inlay to the type II cavity of posterior teeth

Jing Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of two Ceramage inlay(spolygon surface inlay and onlay)on therestorations of posterior teeth.Methods A total of 200 inlays made of Ceramage were used in typeⅡcavity of posteriorteeth after perfect root canal therapy from 2005 to 2008,including 100 polygon surface inlays and 100 onlays;Kruskal-Walls rank sum test was used to evaluate the appearance,edge fitness,color,recurrent caries,abrasion,and fractureof the inlay after 6 months,12 months,24 months and 36 months.Results The two inlays had no significant changes after 6,12,24 and 36 months.There were 5 failures:1 onlay was damaged,1 onlay slapped,2 onlays were found tumbled,1 polygon surface inlay was in good condition,but the tooth damaged.Conclusion Ceramage is a good kind of resin forthe posterior restoration;the polygon surface inlay reserves more tooth and is better to serve life and biomechanics principle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of two Ceramage inlay(spolygon surface inlay and onlay)on therestorations of posterior teeth.Methods A total of 200 inlays made of Ceramage were used in typeⅡcavity of posteriorteeth after perfect root canal therapy from 2005 to 2008,including 100 polygon surface inlays and 100 onlays;Kruskal-Walls rank sum test was used to evaluate the appearance,edge fitness,color,recurrent caries,abrasion,and fractureof the inlay after 6 months,12 months,24 months and 36 months.Results The two inlays had no significant changes after 6,12,24 and 36 months.There were 5 failures:1 onlay was damaged,1 onlay slapped,2 onlays were found tumbled,1 polygon surface inlay was in good condition,but the tooth damaged.Conclusion Ceramage is a good kind of resin forthe posterior restoration;the polygon surface inlay reserves more tooth and is better to serve life and biomechanics principle.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of two Ceramage inlay(spolygon surface inlay and onlay)on therestorations of posterior teeth.Methods A total of 200 inlays made of Ceramage were used in typeⅡcavity of posteriorteeth after perfect root canal therapy from 2005 to 2008,including 100 polygon surface inlays and 100 onlays;Kruskal-Walls rank sum test was used to evaluate the appearance,edge fitness,color,recurrent caries,abrasion,and fractureof the inlay after 6 months,12 months,24 months and 36 months.Results The two inlays had no significant changes after 6,12,24 and 36 months.There were 5 failures:1 onlay was damaged,1 onlay slapped,2 onlays were found tumbled,1 polygon surface inlay was in good condition,but the tooth damaged.Conclusion Ceramage is a good kind of resin forthe posterior restoration;the polygon surface inlay reserves more tooth and is better to serve life and biomechanics principle.

Key concepts: Inlay, Dentistry, Medicine, Abrasion (mechanical), Orthodontics, Root canal, Materials science, Composite material

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical application of Ceramage inlay to the type II cavity of posterior teeth — Research Paper | ScholarLens