Prosthetic disc nucleus replacement for lumbar disc herniation
Zhen Wang
Abstract
Zhen Wang
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of prosthetic disc nucleus (PDN-solo) replacement for lumbar disc herniation by comparing it with traditional solely discectomy. Methods 18 cases of lumbar disc herniation were treated with PDN-solo replacement, including 16 cases of single segment (9 L_(4~5), 7 L_5~S_1) and 2 double segments (L_(4~5) and L_5~S_1). All were performed with single PDN-solo replacement. 30 cases of lumbar disc herniation were treated with traditional solely discectomy as control. The effects in the two groups were observed. Results The clinical symptom in PDN-solo replacement group released totally and segment motion recovered significantly. 6 cases were follow-up for 9~22 months and 9 for 3~9 months. The intervertebral height recovered 10.5% postoperatively. No PDN-solo displacement was found. The effect was significantly better than that of traditional solely discectomy (P0.01). Conclusions PDN-solo replacement can restore the spine segment stability and mobility. Suitable prosthetic design and material selection can help to rebalance the intervertebral disc and posterior column load transmission, which has wide prospective application value.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of prosthetic disc nucleus (PDN-solo) replacement for lumbar disc herniation by comparing it with traditional solely discectomy. Methods 18 cases of lumbar disc herniation were treated with PDN-solo replacement, including 16 cases of single segment (9 L_(4~5), 7 L_5~S_1) and 2 double segments (L_(4~5) and L_5~S_1). All were performed with single PDN-solo replacement. 30 cases of lumbar disc herniation were treated with traditional solely discectomy as control. The effects in the two groups were observed. Results The clinical symptom in PDN-solo replacement group released totally and segment motion recovered significantly. 6 cases were follow-up for 9~22 months and 9 for 3~9 months. The intervertebral height recovered 10.5% postoperatively. No PDN-solo displacement was found. The effect was significantly better than that of traditional solely discectomy (P0.01). Conclusions PDN-solo replacement can restore the spine segment stability and mobility. Suitable prosthetic design and material selection can help to rebalance the intervertebral disc and posterior column load transmission, which has wide prospective application value.
Key concepts: Medicine, Discectomy, Lumbar disc herniation, Intervertebral disc, Degenerative disc disease, Disc herniation, Surgery, Lumbar