A Reflection on the Photocopyism in Public Prosecution
Yan Wang
Abstract
Yan Wang
Abstract
The defects of photocopyism in public prosecution lie in that: there is likelihood for pretrial bias of judges, which infringes the right of the defendant to access to all the evidence against him and hence amounts to camouflaged trial. It is imperative to establish the public prosecution procedures based on the natural laws of public prosecution and equity values. This paper attempts to make proposals as to reform public prosecution aiming at separating trial from investigation, enhance the core position of trial and strengthen the right of the defendant by institutionalizing the public prosecution based on the exclusiveness of the bill of prosecution and the system of evidence display.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The defects of photocopyism in public prosecution lie in that: there is likelihood for pretrial bias of judges, which infringes the right of the defendant to access to all the evidence against him and hence amounts to camouflaged trial. It is imperative to establish the public prosecution procedures based on the natural laws of public prosecution and equity values. This paper attempts to make proposals as to reform public prosecution aiming at separating trial from investigation, enhance the core position of trial and strengthen the right of the defendant by institutionalizing the public prosecution based on the exclusiveness of the bill of prosecution and the system of evidence display.
Key concepts: Equity (law), Position (finance), Law, Reflection (computer programming), Political science, Public prosecutor, Law and economics, Business