2003Journal of The National Procurators CollegeRequires access

On the Withdrawal of Public Prosecution

Jin Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this author's point of view, the withdrawal of public prosecution is not only in line with the requirements of the principle of the separation of prosecution and adjudication and that of freedom in prosecution, but also embodies the pursuit of justice and efficiency. It is further emphasized that the time for withdrawing a case should be before the end of investigation in court, and that the reason for withdrawal is there exists circumstances where nonprosecution decision should be made. In order to protect the rights and interests of the parties, the court should conduct judicial review on cases for which the prosecution organs ask to withdraw; meanwhile, take the opinions of the defendant and the victim into consideration. It is also pointed out that, in terms of the legal effect, there are both similarities and difference between the withdrawal of public prosecution and nonprosecution. 

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this author's point of view, the withdrawal of public prosecution is not only in line with the requirements of the principle of the separation of prosecution and adjudication and that of freedom in prosecution, but also embodies the pursuit of justice and efficiency. It is further emphasized that the time for withdrawing a case should be before the end of investigation in court, and that the reason for withdrawal is there exists circumstances where nonprosecution decision should be made. In order to protect the rights and interests of the parties, the court should conduct judicial review on cases for which the prosecution organs ask to withdraw; meanwhile, take the opinions of the defendant and the victim into consideration. It is also pointed out that, in terms of the legal effect, there are both similarities and difference between the withdrawal of public prosecution and nonprosecution. 

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this author's point of view, the withdrawal of public prosecution is not only in line with the requirements of the principle of the separation of prosecution and adjudication and that of freedom in prosecution, but also embodies the pursuit of justice and efficiency. It is further emphasized that the time for withdrawing a case should be before the end of investigation in court, and that the reason for withdrawal is there exists circumstances where nonprosecution decision should be made. In order to protect the rights and interests of the parties, the court should conduct judicial review on cases for which the prosecution organs ask to withdraw; meanwhile, take the opinions of the defendant and the victim into consideration. It is also pointed out that, in terms of the legal effect, there are both similarities and difference between the withdrawal of public prosecution and nonprosecution. 

Key concepts: Adjudication, Economic Justice, Law, Political science, Order (exchange), Business, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Withdrawal of Public Prosecution — Research Paper | ScholarLens