2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Discussion of Theories of Law Education and of Issues Concerning Their Practice

Fei Changshan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In China law education and legal profession have been separated from each other for a long time, which is a barrier to the process of ruling the state by law in modern times. This paper argues that it is the prerequisite for the healthy development of education in law to establish ideas and notions of law education which conform to social requirements, that the development of the legal profession and its actual needs and demands constitute the internal driving force of law education, and that a definite classification of the legal profession will promote the development of law education in the light of its types and levels. Besides, the paper maintains that the fundamental task of law education is to train and bring up qualified talents competent for various jobs in law in accordance with the basic needs of the legal profession. The paper concludes that law education and legal profession constitute a dialectical unity, the two being mutually complementory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In China law education and legal profession have been separated from each other for a long time, which is a barrier to the process of ruling the state by law in modern times. This paper argues that it is the prerequisite for the healthy development of education in law to establish ideas and notions of law education which conform to social requirements, that the development of the legal profession and its actual needs and demands constitute the internal driving force of law education, and that a definite classification of the legal profession will promote the development of law education in the light of its types and levels. Besides, the paper maintains that the fundamental task of law education is to train and bring up qualified talents competent for various jobs in law in accordance with the basic needs of the legal profession. The paper concludes that law education and legal profession constitute a dialectical unity, the two being mutually complementory.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In China law education and legal profession have been separated from each other for a long time, which is a barrier to the process of ruling the state by law in modern times. This paper argues that it is the prerequisite for the healthy development of education in law to establish ideas and notions of law education which conform to social requirements, that the development of the legal profession and its actual needs and demands constitute the internal driving force of law education, and that a definite classification of the legal profession will promote the development of law education in the light of its types and levels. Besides, the paper maintains that the fundamental task of law education is to train and bring up qualified talents competent for various jobs in law in accordance with the basic needs of the legal profession. The paper concludes that law education and legal profession constitute a dialectical unity, the two being mutually complementory.

Key concepts: Legal profession, Law, Legal education, Dialectic, Political science, Philosophy of law, Legal research, Process (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discussion of Theories of Law Education and of Issues Concerning Their Practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens