2011•Medical InformationRequires access

Comparison of the efficacy between insulin aspart and prompt insulin with continuous subcutaneous insulin infnsion(CSII) in type 2 diabetics

Zeng Gang-y

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety between insulin aspart and prompt insulin with continuous subcutaneous insulin infnsion(CSⅡ) in type 2 diabetics.Methods:191 and 216 patients were treated with insulin aspart and prompt insulin by CSII,respectively.To compare Pre-Tx and Post-Tx FPG,average PG,FC-P,2hC-P,glucose-targeted time and insulin dosage.Results:After the treatment,insulin aspart group was as effective as prompt insulin group in the parameters of the above glucose and C-peptide(all P0.05).The average duration of treatment and hypoglycemia incidence showed no obvious difference between two groups(P0.05) but the insulin does and cost of hospitalization were markedly decreased in insulin aspart group(P0.05).Conclusion:Insulin aspart with CSⅡ treatment for type 2 diabetes effect is effectively and more economical.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety between insulin aspart and prompt insulin with continuous subcutaneous insulin infnsion(CSⅡ) in type 2 diabetics.Methods:191 and 216 patients were treated with insulin aspart and prompt insulin by CSII,respectively.To compare Pre-Tx and Post-Tx FPG,average PG,FC-P,2hC-P,glucose-targeted time and insulin dosage.Results:After the treatment,insulin aspart group was as effective as prompt insulin group in the parameters of the above glucose and C-peptide(all P0.05).The average duration of treatment and hypoglycemia incidence showed no obvious difference between two groups(P0.05) but the insulin does and cost of hospitalization were markedly decreased in insulin aspart group(P0.05).Conclusion:Insulin aspart with CSⅡ treatment for type 2 diabetes effect is effectively and more economical.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety between insulin aspart and prompt insulin with continuous subcutaneous insulin infnsion(CSⅡ) in type 2 diabetics.Methods:191 and 216 patients were treated with insulin aspart and prompt insulin by CSII,respectively.To compare Pre-Tx and Post-Tx FPG,average PG,FC-P,2hC-P,glucose-targeted time and insulin dosage.Results:After the treatment,insulin aspart group was as effective as prompt insulin group in the parameters of the above glucose and C-peptide(all P0.05).The average duration of treatment and hypoglycemia incidence showed no obvious difference between two groups(P0.05) but the insulin does and cost of hospitalization were markedly decreased in insulin aspart group(P0.05).Conclusion:Insulin aspart with CSⅡ treatment for type 2 diabetes effect is effectively and more economical.

Key concepts: Insulin aspart, Medicine, Insulin, Hypoglycemia, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Type 1 diabetes, Subcutaneous injection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the efficacy between insulin aspart and prompt insulin with continuous subcutaneous insulin infnsion(CSII) in type 2 diabetics — Research Paper | ScholarLens