2011Shanghai yixueRequires access

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation of eclampsia patients in intensive care unit

YU Kai-jian

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation of eclampsia patients.Methods Forty eclampsia patients were admitted to our intensive care unit(ICU) from May 2010 to April 2011.Pregnancies of the patients were terminated via caesarean delivery under general anesthesia and ventilatory support was needed;they were randomly divided into two groups to receive either dexmedetomidine or propofol.The dexmedetomidine group(Group D,n=20) received a loading dose of 1 μg·kg-1·h-1 for 20 min,followed by continuous infusion at 0.3-0.7 μg·kg-1·h-1.The propofol group(Group P,n=20) received a loading dose of 1 mg/kg,followed by continuous infusion at 0.5-4.0 mg·kg-1·h-1.The heart rate,blood pressure,anti-hypertension drug dosage,fentanyl dosage and duration in ICU were compared between the 2 groups.Results Compared with Group P,the heart rate in Group D was significantly slower within 24h after operation(P0.05),and the heart rates were similar between the 2 groups during 24-72 h after operation(P0.05).Moreover,the demand for antihypertensive medicine,the demand for fentanyl,and duration of ICU stay were significantly less in Group D compared with those in Group P(P0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine is safe and effective for the sedation of eclampsia patients,which can reduce the demand for antihypertensive medicine and fentanyl,and shorten the duration of ICU stay.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation of eclampsia patients.Methods Forty eclampsia patients were admitted to our intensive care unit(ICU) from May 2010 to April 2011.Pregnancies of the patients were terminated via caesarean delivery under general anesthesia and ventilatory support was needed;they were randomly divided into two groups to receive either dexmedetomidine or propofol.The dexmedetomidine group(Group D,n=20) received a loading dose of 1 μg·kg-1·h-1 for 20 min,followed by continuous infusion at 0.3-0.7 μg·kg-1·h-1.The propofol group(Group P,n=20) received a loading dose of 1 mg/kg,followed by continuous infusion at 0.5-4.0 mg·kg-1·h-1.The heart rate,blood pressure,anti-hypertension drug dosage,fentanyl dosage and duration in ICU were compared between the 2 groups.Results Compared with Group P,the heart rate in Group D was significantly slower within 24h after operation(P0.05),and the heart rates were similar between the 2 groups during 24-72 h after operation(P0.05).Moreover,the demand for antihypertensive medicine,the demand for fentanyl,and duration of ICU stay were significantly less in Group D compared with those in Group P(P0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine is safe and effective for the sedation of eclampsia patients,which can reduce the demand for antihypertensive medicine and fentanyl,and shorten the duration of ICU stay.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation of eclampsia patients.Methods Forty eclampsia patients were admitted to our intensive care unit(ICU) from May 2010 to April 2011.Pregnancies of the patients were terminated via caesarean delivery under general anesthesia and ventilatory support was needed;they were randomly divided into two groups to receive either dexmedetomidine or propofol.The dexmedetomidine group(Group D,n=20) received a loading dose of 1 μg·kg-1·h-1 for 20 min,followed by continuous infusion at 0.3-0.7 μg·kg-1·h-1.The propofol group(Group P,n=20) received a loading dose of 1 mg/kg,followed by continuous infusion at 0.5-4.0 mg·kg-1·h-1.The heart rate,blood pressure,anti-hypertension drug dosage,fentanyl dosage and duration in ICU were compared between the 2 groups.Results Compared with Group P,the heart rate in Group D was significantly slower within 24h after operation(P0.05),and the heart rates were similar between the 2 groups during 24-72 h after operation(P0.05).Moreover,the demand for antihypertensive medicine,the demand for fentanyl,and duration of ICU stay were significantly less in Group D compared with those in Group P(P0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine is safe and effective for the sedation of eclampsia patients,which can reduce the demand for antihypertensive medicine and fentanyl,and shorten the duration of ICU stay.

Key concepts: Dexmedetomidine, Medicine, Fentanyl, Sedation, Propofol, Anesthesia, Eclampsia, Intensive care unit

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation of eclampsia patients in intensive care unit — Research Paper | ScholarLens