On the Dialectic Relationship Between the Arbitrariness and Iconicity of Linguistic Signs
Bin Huang
Abstract
Bin Huang
Abstract
Through an analysis of the relationship between arbitrariness and iconicity of linguistic signs approached from the theory of self-organization and prototype theory, this paper advocates that their relationship is dialectic. The theory of iconicity and that of arbitrariness can exist within the same unity, which, seeming opposing, are complementary to each other. The realization of the dialectic relationship between the arbitrariness and iconicity of linguistic signs is of great pragmatic significance in ELT, which can make English language teaching and learning much more meaningful.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Through an analysis of the relationship between arbitrariness and iconicity of linguistic signs approached from the theory of self-organization and prototype theory, this paper advocates that their relationship is dialectic. The theory of iconicity and that of arbitrariness can exist within the same unity, which, seeming opposing, are complementary to each other. The realization of the dialectic relationship between the arbitrariness and iconicity of linguistic signs is of great pragmatic significance in ELT, which can make English language teaching and learning much more meaningful.
Key concepts: Arbitrariness, Iconicity, Dialectic, Linguistics, Realization (probability), Construal level theory, Epistemology, Philosophy