2013•Jinrong luntanRequires access

The Risks and Regulatory Reform of Shadow Banking

HE Jian-qin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of Chinese and Ameirican shadow banking in the aspects of operation mode, financial tools, financial institutions, risk transmission and so on. The results show that, at present, Chinese shadow banking hasn’t basically entered the field of asset securitization, their financial tools are simple and the leverage ratio is low. Neverthless, huge risks hide in Chinese shadow banking which have negative impacts on the operation of traditional commercial banks, and the function of the credit creation of shadow banking weakens the effects of monetary policy, the high interest rates distort fund price and hurt real economy. Therefore, it’s necessary to improve relevant laws and regulations, supervise shadow banking, strengthen the cooperation of PBC, CBRC, CIRC and CSRC, introduce function supervision, increase the transparency of the information disclosure of shadow banking, construct the supervision framework that combines the macro-prudential supervision and the micro-prudential supervision, strengthen the early warning and dynamic monitoring of the systemic risks of shadow banking.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a comparative study of Chinese and Ameirican shadow banking in the aspects of operation mode, financial tools, financial institutions, risk transmission and so on. The results show that, at present, Chinese shadow banking hasn’t basically entered the field of asset securitization, their financial tools are simple and the leverage ratio is low. Neverthless, huge risks hide in Chinese shadow banking which have negative impacts on the operation of traditional commercial banks, and the function of the credit creation of shadow banking weakens the effects of monetary policy, the high interest rates distort fund price and hurt real economy. Therefore, it’s necessary to improve relevant laws and regulations, supervise shadow banking, strengthen the cooperation of PBC, CBRC, CIRC and CSRC, introduce function supervision, increase the transparency of the information disclosure of shadow banking, construct the supervision framework that combines the macro-prudential supervision and the micro-prudential supervision, strengthen the early warning and dynamic monitoring of the systemic risks of shadow banking.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of Chinese and Ameirican shadow banking in the aspects of operation mode, financial tools, financial institutions, risk transmission and so on. The results show that, at present, Chinese shadow banking hasn’t basically entered the field of asset securitization, their financial tools are simple and the leverage ratio is low. Neverthless, huge risks hide in Chinese shadow banking which have negative impacts on the operation of traditional commercial banks, and the function of the credit creation of shadow banking weakens the effects of monetary policy, the high interest rates distort fund price and hurt real economy. Therefore, it’s necessary to improve relevant laws and regulations, supervise shadow banking, strengthen the cooperation of PBC, CBRC, CIRC and CSRC, introduce function supervision, increase the transparency of the information disclosure of shadow banking, construct the supervision framework that combines the macro-prudential supervision and the micro-prudential supervision, strengthen the early warning and dynamic monitoring of the systemic risks of shadow banking.

Key concepts: Shadow (psychology), Shadow banking system, Leverage (statistics), Securitization, Business, Transparency (behavior), Systemic risk, Financial system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Risks and Regulatory Reform of Shadow Banking — Research Paper | ScholarLens