Vitrectomy for proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Qin Yaow
Abstract
Qin Yaow
Abstract
Objective:To evaluate the effect of vitrectomy in the proliferative vitreoretinopathy(PVR).Methods:21 cases of PVR(≥Grade-C2) with retinal detachment were treated by vitrectomy and scleral encircling buckling, membrane peeling, retinotomy, and gas or silicon oil tamponade.Results:The retina was reattached in a rate of 78.9% in 2~9 months postoperatively, visual acuity improved significantly in 20 eyes(95.2%). 4 eyes failed because of PVR recurrent.Conclusion:Modern vitrectomy is optimal operation for PVR. The most important technique is membrane peeling and eliminating the traction of vitreous base. PVR recurrent is major cause of failure.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To evaluate the effect of vitrectomy in the proliferative vitreoretinopathy(PVR).Methods:21 cases of PVR(≥Grade-C2) with retinal detachment were treated by vitrectomy and scleral encircling buckling, membrane peeling, retinotomy, and gas or silicon oil tamponade.Results:The retina was reattached in a rate of 78.9% in 2~9 months postoperatively, visual acuity improved significantly in 20 eyes(95.2%). 4 eyes failed because of PVR recurrent.Conclusion:Modern vitrectomy is optimal operation for PVR. The most important technique is membrane peeling and eliminating the traction of vitreous base. PVR recurrent is major cause of failure.
Key concepts: Vitrectomy, Proliferative vitreoretinopathy, Tamponade, Retinal detachment, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Visual acuity, Retina