2005•Journal of Central China Normal UniversityRequires access

Moral and the Legitimacy of Traditional Politics of China

Ren Jian-tao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The article, combining with Max Weber's three kinds of ideal types of political legitimacy, explains legitimacy of traditional politics of China from two sides: One, from the point of construction of political philosophy, traditional politics of China is a political form of rule by moral establishing its legitimacy basis on ethics and moral which becomes the representative of rule of tradition. The other, from the point of political operation state, it represents a rule of charisma which integrates ethical model with political authority. At last, to discuss history legitimacy and disadvantages legitimacy of traditional politics of China and its three differences with modern political legitimacy, the article points that ethics and moral construction of legitimacy of traditional politics turning to modern jurisprudence construction is necessary and dealing with both sides' relations also cannot be ignored.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article, combining with Max Weber's three kinds of ideal types of political legitimacy, explains legitimacy of traditional politics of China from two sides: One, from the point of construction of political philosophy, traditional politics of China is a political form of rule by moral establishing its legitimacy basis on ethics and moral which becomes the representative of rule of tradition. The other, from the point of political operation state, it represents a rule of charisma which integrates ethical model with political authority. At last, to discuss history legitimacy and disadvantages legitimacy of traditional politics of China and its three differences with modern political legitimacy, the article points that ethics and moral construction of legitimacy of traditional politics turning to modern jurisprudence construction is necessary and dealing with both sides' relations also cannot be ignored.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article, combining with Max Weber's three kinds of ideal types of political legitimacy, explains legitimacy of traditional politics of China from two sides: One, from the point of construction of political philosophy, traditional politics of China is a political form of rule by moral establishing its legitimacy basis on ethics and moral which becomes the representative of rule of tradition. The other, from the point of political operation state, it represents a rule of charisma which integrates ethical model with political authority. At last, to discuss history legitimacy and disadvantages legitimacy of traditional politics of China and its three differences with modern political legitimacy, the article points that ethics and moral construction of legitimacy of traditional politics turning to modern jurisprudence construction is necessary and dealing with both sides' relations also cannot be ignored.

Key concepts: Legitimacy, Politics, China, Ideal (ethics), Law, Political science, Jurisprudence, Charisma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Moral and the Legitimacy of Traditional Politics of China — Research Paper | ScholarLens