2015Beifang faxueRequires access

Confusion of Personality and Disregard of Legal Personality——Comment on No. 15 of Cases Summary by the Supreme Court

Wang Ju

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

No.15 of Cases Summary by the Supreme Court has adopted the stance that disregard of legal personality should be prudently appliedand strictly determined,which nevertheless has three shortcomings. Firstly,the argumentation for constitution of personality confusion is improperly emphasized while the reason why personality confusion would gravely impair the creditor lacks proof and argumentation,which would cause negative effects that the court tends to easily disregard legal personality. Secondly,the referential applicationof Paragraph 3 under Article 20 of the Corporate Law does not satisfy requirements of analogy application. Thirdly,it lacks rationale and feasibility to determine theaffiliated corporatesashorizontal personality confusionand further as restricted condition for disregarding legal personality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

No.15 of Cases Summary by the Supreme Court has adopted the stance that disregard of legal personality should be prudently appliedand strictly determined,which nevertheless has three shortcomings. Firstly,the argumentation for constitution of personality confusion is improperly emphasized while the reason why personality confusion would gravely impair the creditor lacks proof and argumentation,which would cause negative effects that the court tends to easily disregard legal personality. Secondly,the referential applicationof Paragraph 3 under Article 20 of the Corporate Law does not satisfy requirements of analogy application. Thirdly,it lacks rationale and feasibility to determine theaffiliated corporatesashorizontal personality confusionand further as restricted condition for disregarding legal personality.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

No.15 of Cases Summary by the Supreme Court has adopted the stance that disregard of legal personality should be prudently appliedand strictly determined,which nevertheless has three shortcomings. Firstly,the argumentation for constitution of personality confusion is improperly emphasized while the reason why personality confusion would gravely impair the creditor lacks proof and argumentation,which would cause negative effects that the court tends to easily disregard legal personality. Secondly,the referential applicationof Paragraph 3 under Article 20 of the Corporate Law does not satisfy requirements of analogy application. Thirdly,it lacks rationale and feasibility to determine theaffiliated corporatesashorizontal personality confusionand further as restricted condition for disregarding legal personality.

Key concepts: Personality, Constitution, Supreme court, Argumentation theory, Confusion, Law, Paragraph, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Confusion of Personality and Disregard of Legal Personality——Comment on No. 15 of Cases Summary by the Supreme Court — Research Paper | ScholarLens