2005•Di-san junyi daxue xuebaoRequires access

Evaluating the clinical effects of light cure Dyractflow in pit and fissure enamel-plasty sealant technique during 3 years

Jingjing Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of light cure Dyractflow (LCDF) in pit and fissure enamel-plasty sealant technique (EST). Methods A total of 400 first permanent molars in 200 patients aged from 6 to 10 years were treated with LCDF in occlusal pit and fissure enamel-plasty sealant technique. The opposite permanent teeth treated with LCDF in occlusal pit and fissure conventional sealant technique (CST) were employed as the controls. The patients were followed up for 3 years. Results Follow-up for 3 years showed that there was no significant difference in preservation rate between the EST and the CST groups in the first year, but in 2-3 years, there was significant difference in preservation rate (P0.01) and in caries prevalence rate (P0.01) between the EST and the CST groups. Conclusion LCDF can be used as pit and fissure sealant to prevent caries. EST is better than CST in clinical application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of light cure Dyractflow (LCDF) in pit and fissure enamel-plasty sealant technique (EST). Methods A total of 400 first permanent molars in 200 patients aged from 6 to 10 years were treated with LCDF in occlusal pit and fissure enamel-plasty sealant technique. The opposite permanent teeth treated with LCDF in occlusal pit and fissure conventional sealant technique (CST) were employed as the controls. The patients were followed up for 3 years. Results Follow-up for 3 years showed that there was no significant difference in preservation rate between the EST and the CST groups in the first year, but in 2-3 years, there was significant difference in preservation rate (P0.01) and in caries prevalence rate (P0.01) between the EST and the CST groups. Conclusion LCDF can be used as pit and fissure sealant to prevent caries. EST is better than CST in clinical application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of light cure Dyractflow (LCDF) in pit and fissure enamel-plasty sealant technique (EST). Methods A total of 400 first permanent molars in 200 patients aged from 6 to 10 years were treated with LCDF in occlusal pit and fissure enamel-plasty sealant technique. The opposite permanent teeth treated with LCDF in occlusal pit and fissure conventional sealant technique (CST) were employed as the controls. The patients were followed up for 3 years. Results Follow-up for 3 years showed that there was no significant difference in preservation rate between the EST and the CST groups in the first year, but in 2-3 years, there was significant difference in preservation rate (P0.01) and in caries prevalence rate (P0.01) between the EST and the CST groups. Conclusion LCDF can be used as pit and fissure sealant to prevent caries. EST is better than CST in clinical application.

Key concepts: Sealant, Dentistry, Enamel paint, Fissure, Medicine, Molar, Significant difference, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating the clinical effects of light cure Dyractflow in pit and fissure enamel-plasty sealant technique during 3 years — Research Paper | ScholarLens