2013Journal of Central South University(Social Science)Requires access

Substantive judge conditions and reflections on the judicial interpretations of the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation

Huang Xianxiong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the year of 2000,the Supreme People's Court has formulated a number of terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation which should not be formulated within the scope in its judicial interpretations.These terms don’t distinguish between the scope of accepting cases and other conditions for admissibility as well as trial on merits,thus increasing the difficulty to place cases on file for trial.We should learn from the institution of substantive judge conditions which is adopted in German,Japan and Taiwan.First,we should remove those inappropriate negative lists and simplify the terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation;Second,we should lower the suit’s threshold and weaken its function,and divide the boundary between judicial power and administrative power;Finally,we should increase an investigating procedure on substantive judge conditions or litigation interests narrowly defined so as to prevent the abuse of judicial resources.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the year of 2000,the Supreme People's Court has formulated a number of terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation which should not be formulated within the scope in its judicial interpretations.These terms don’t distinguish between the scope of accepting cases and other conditions for admissibility as well as trial on merits,thus increasing the difficulty to place cases on file for trial.We should learn from the institution of substantive judge conditions which is adopted in German,Japan and Taiwan.First,we should remove those inappropriate negative lists and simplify the terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation;Second,we should lower the suit’s threshold and weaken its function,and divide the boundary between judicial power and administrative power;Finally,we should increase an investigating procedure on substantive judge conditions or litigation interests narrowly defined so as to prevent the abuse of judicial resources.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the year of 2000,the Supreme People's Court has formulated a number of terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation which should not be formulated within the scope in its judicial interpretations.These terms don’t distinguish between the scope of accepting cases and other conditions for admissibility as well as trial on merits,thus increasing the difficulty to place cases on file for trial.We should learn from the institution of substantive judge conditions which is adopted in German,Japan and Taiwan.First,we should remove those inappropriate negative lists and simplify the terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation;Second,we should lower the suit’s threshold and weaken its function,and divide the boundary between judicial power and administrative power;Finally,we should increase an investigating procedure on substantive judge conditions or litigation interests narrowly defined so as to prevent the abuse of judicial resources.

Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Supreme court, Law, Political science, Institution, Power (physics), Substantive law, Function (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Substantive judge conditions and reflections on the judicial interpretations of the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation — Research Paper | ScholarLens