Substantive judge conditions and reflections on the judicial interpretations of the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation
Huang Xianxiong
Abstract
Huang Xianxiong
Abstract
Since the year of 2000,the Supreme People's Court has formulated a number of terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation which should not be formulated within the scope in its judicial interpretations.These terms don’t distinguish between the scope of accepting cases and other conditions for admissibility as well as trial on merits,thus increasing the difficulty to place cases on file for trial.We should learn from the institution of substantive judge conditions which is adopted in German,Japan and Taiwan.First,we should remove those inappropriate negative lists and simplify the terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation;Second,we should lower the suit’s threshold and weaken its function,and divide the boundary between judicial power and administrative power;Finally,we should increase an investigating procedure on substantive judge conditions or litigation interests narrowly defined so as to prevent the abuse of judicial resources.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Since the year of 2000,the Supreme People's Court has formulated a number of terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation which should not be formulated within the scope in its judicial interpretations.These terms don’t distinguish between the scope of accepting cases and other conditions for admissibility as well as trial on merits,thus increasing the difficulty to place cases on file for trial.We should learn from the institution of substantive judge conditions which is adopted in German,Japan and Taiwan.First,we should remove those inappropriate negative lists and simplify the terms on the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation;Second,we should lower the suit’s threshold and weaken its function,and divide the boundary between judicial power and administrative power;Finally,we should increase an investigating procedure on substantive judge conditions or litigation interests narrowly defined so as to prevent the abuse of judicial resources.
Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Supreme court, Law, Political science, Institution, Power (physics), Substantive law, Function (biology)