Reflection and Improvement of Litigation Relief in China's Administrative Contract Dispute Resolution
Qian Long
Abstract
Qian Long
Abstract
The clauses related to the administrative contracts in the new Administrative Litigation Law and the judicial interpretation about the administrative contracts in Interpretation of Applicability together constitute the normative basis of the current case hearing of the administrative contracts. However, in the current practice of judicial trials of administrative contracts, the intrinsic defects of the normative basis are gradually becoming more apparent. These defects specifically include the vagueness of the scope of case accepting, the unclarity of the normative application rules, and low operability etc. This article intends to reflect on the above defects. The author argues that it is necessary to define the scope of case accepting of administrative contracts based on positive and negative criteria. Within the subset of administrative litigation - the administrative contracts, discriminating the characteristics of differences disputes and making the disputes applicable to different normative application rules.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The clauses related to the administrative contracts in the new Administrative Litigation Law and the judicial interpretation about the administrative contracts in Interpretation of Applicability together constitute the normative basis of the current case hearing of the administrative contracts. However, in the current practice of judicial trials of administrative contracts, the intrinsic defects of the normative basis are gradually becoming more apparent. These defects specifically include the vagueness of the scope of case accepting, the unclarity of the normative application rules, and low operability etc. This article intends to reflect on the above defects. The author argues that it is necessary to define the scope of case accepting of administrative contracts based on positive and negative criteria. Within the subset of administrative litigation - the administrative contracts, discriminating the characteristics of differences disputes and making the disputes applicable to different normative application rules.
Key concepts: Normative, Vagueness, Scope (computer science), Interpretation (philosophy), Dispute resolution, Administrative law, Judicial interpretation, Law and economics